homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.23.12.202
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: goodroi

Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues Forum

    
WSJ: There's No Avoiding Google+
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 6:24 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

I think we've known this for some time as we've seen each Google property requiring G+.

This story from the WSJ is a little late for us, but for the uninitiated it might make some of them think.

Google Inc. is challenging Facebook Inc. by using a controversial tactic: requiring people to use the Google+ social network.

The result is that people who create an account to use Gmail, YouTube and other Google services—including the Zagat restaurant-review website—are also being set up with public Google+ pages that can be viewed by anyone online. Google+ is a Facebook rival and one of the company's most important recent initiatives as it tries to snag more online advertising dollars.

The impetus comes from the top. Google Chief Executive Larry Page has sought more aggressive measures to get people to use Google+, two people familiar with the matter say. Google created Google+ in large part to prevent Facebook from dominating the social-networking business.WSJ: There's No Avoiding Google+ [online.wsj.com]

 

Panthro



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 6:32 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

I wonder if eventually you'll have to log in to some service to access the www.

albo

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 8:25 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

@Panthro - China's set the precedent: can the world be far behind?

Panthro



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 8:43 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

@albo - How's that work? Never been to China myself

Sgt_Kickaxe

WebmasterWorld Senior Member sgt_kickaxe us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 9:01 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

That's funny, I avoid Google+ just fine and I have been to China so I can confirm that you are much more free to surf than the U.S. news agencies would have you believe.

Take the recent hype about China making it harder for people to access the net, it was in every news site recently. What did China do to deserve the hate from U.S. media? China made it law that internet providers would need to acquire the real names of their clients. Guess what, that's been standard in the U.S. for a decade, but U.S. media skips over that little tidbit.

nomis5

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 9:37 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

I don't get it, they force people to create a G+ account when they sign up to something else and, yes they sign up, I did. I then ignore my G+ account because I don't see that it's any use to me and that's that.

Creating G+ accounts is one thing but people using them is a totally different matter. I continue to get emails from G+ about people following / subscribing and whatever, I have no idea what it all means and no inclination to find out.

It's the same with Gmail - I must now have several different accounts none of which I use, I don't know what the logon is nor the passwords, same with G+. It's a joke.

albo

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 9:51 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

@Panthro - I *ass-u-me* ;) you've read the news. One story: [engadget.com...]

randle

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 10:00 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Since Google+ made its debut in mid-2011, the Mountain View, Calif., company has had limited success getting people to spend time directly on the Google+ site. Research firm comScore Inc. a year ago estimated that Google+ users spent an average of three minutes on the site each month, versus more than 400 minutes for the average Facebook user. In the U.S., Google+ had nearly 28.7 million unique visitors through PCs in October—well below Facebook's 149 million, comScore says.


I just don't know, strong arming people to actively participate in your social networking platform seems like a risky approach, born out of frustration.

ChanandlerBong

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 10:47 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

next time you find yourself reading a popular article on a news site or blog, check out the share numbers for FB, Tw and G+, that tells you how much they're actually being used on an everyday basis, not just forced accounts being opened in order to access other stuff.

the current ratio seems to be about 100-1: 100 Tw/FB shares for every G+ share.

G+ is a failure.

They should rename it Google Buzz 2.

seoskunk



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 10:59 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

There's plenty of avoiding Google +, just ask FB

blend27

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 11:57 pm on Jan 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

every time some uses the word "THEY".. it becomes addictive to the masses...

celgins

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 1:23 am on Jan 4, 2013 (gmt 0)

Unless people begin to tire of Facebook and leave in droves to setup shop on a site like Google+, not much will change. Facebook and Twitter dominate the social market and I think it's a little late for Google's strong arming

netmeg

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 2:36 am on Jan 4, 2013 (gmt 0)

Only an exceedingly anti social person would think you could really force people to be social.

brotherhood of LAN

WebmasterWorld Administrator brotherhood_of_lan us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 2:48 am on Jan 4, 2013 (gmt 0)

I just don't know, strong arming people to actively participate in your social networking platform seems like a risky approach, born out of frustration.


I'd agree, but there's also the other benefits of unifying accounts & associating them with people, regardless of whether people "post stuff" on G+ or not.

jetteroheller

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jetteroheller us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4532915 posted 7:14 pm on Jan 15, 2013 (gmt 0)

I am hit since April 2011 with the Panda update from Google.
I started with Google plus in the hope to have some positive effects on search results coming back to my strength before April 2011.

About 3400 followers on Google plus, many posts, many links to my site, many discussions, but no effects on my site.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved