tigger
msg:4524142 | 1:47 pm on Dec 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
would have been funny if they'd used youtube for the video ;o)
just gotta get the word out that there is another SE....man sad times when you just say "another" SE, what a crap state the internet is now
|
lucy24
msg:4524232 | 10:58 pm on Dec 1, 2012 (gmt 0) |
The irony of course is that there's a pretty huge overlap between people who don't know that there exists a function called "search engine", of which g### is just one version ... and those who similarly don't know that {insert-name-here} is just one version of the "browser" function.
:: snrk ::
|
TypicalSurfer
msg:4524298 | 1:42 pm on Dec 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
Bing is just pointing out the obvious, so for informational purposes I suppose it works but unless they offered a more competitive advertising model like fixed click prices they are just a "me too" thingy.
|
netmeg
msg:4524299 | 1:58 pm on Dec 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
As someone who uses shopping feeds *prodigiously* in both search engines, there's a whole lotta hypocrisy (and more than a little desperation) in that post.
|
TypicalSurfer
msg:4524305 | 2:44 pm on Dec 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
I don't think bing is desperate, I think they are more than happy to let google be the pioneer in this market. Playing the role of #2 keeps them out of the sights of the usual cast of regulatory characters, they can toy with google a bit, let the pioneer bear the brunt of the hatchet attacks.
|
lucy24
msg:4524379 | 11:03 pm on Dec 2, 2012 (gmt 0) |
"We Try Harder" ?
|
lexipixel
msg:4543475 | 5:04 pm on Feb 7, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Now MSFT is using "SCROOGLED" for an "Outlook v. Gmail" smear campaign, (ummm, I mean, "consumer education initiative").
[scroogled.com...]
|
|
