| 7:26 pm on Oct 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
I'm sure if he searches for headache pills, he'll find many knock off pharmacy sites willing to sell them to him..or he could just look through the list of major adwords spenders in the previous 3 years..he probably has most of them on speed dial on his nexus anyway ;)
| 7:29 pm on Oct 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
| 7:32 pm on Oct 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
If Larry searches in G for headache pills, he's unlikely to find any relevant items in the SERPS. Probably best to go to Bing.
| 7:47 pm on Oct 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
I meant, he'd find them in the ads..but his speed dial of huge adwords pharma spenders, would be faster..
| 10:51 pm on Oct 18, 2012 (gmt 0)|
|Google France had said earlier that the plan "would be harmful to the internet, internet users and news websites that benefit from substantial traffic" that comes via Google's search engine. |
We all know that computer users can be divided into people who know what a browser is, and people who let their pre-installed MSIE magically take them to "The Internet".
Time for another line of inquiry: How many people still know that google is just one member of the class "search engine"?
| 3:22 am on Oct 29, 2012 (gmt 0)|
""The question is whether by returning a search result Google is infringing the copyright of a site. The publishers will continue to contest this, but the general consensus is that it is not," he added."
What about caching and previewing the whole page of a website?
What's the general consensus on that!?
I can't wait till google starts paying me for giving their customers are free look at my pages.