homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.195.158
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: goodroi

Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues Forum

    
Google Acquires Like.com Visual Search and Image Comparision Engine
Webwork




msg:4190175
 12:36 pm on Aug 21, 2010 (gmt 0)

Confirmed by Reuters [reuters.com ].

Just keeping up with the neighbors or all part of the eventual, full-blown, G as G-eCom play?

 

Compworld




msg:4190974
 4:05 pm on Aug 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

Like, really amazing.

frontpage




msg:4191024
 5:15 pm on Aug 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

Anyone know the user agents for these new acquisitions so we can block them?

ergophobe




msg:4191028
 5:27 pm on Aug 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

Do my Montrails look so much different than my Adidas? Based on the results I just got by clicking Visual Search for a pair of Garmont trail runners, I would say this is useless for 99% of the items I purchase. I guess that's why I never heard of Like.com until today.

The one thing about Google shopping comparison as it stands, though, is it has a hell of time distinguishing between a "Canon 5D" and a "Canon 5D replacement battery". So "sort by price" is usually fairly useless.

If they can match the actual product pictures, which are commonly supplied by the manufacturer and thus, in fact, identical, that opens the possibility for meaningful multi-facted filter/sort. I can perhaps do a search that essentially ends up as
filter:"Canon 5D"
filter:"things for which the product picture looks like this picture" sort:"price, ascending".

That means that I can very quickly get better price comparisons.

On the other hand, what I would like to see more would be similarity search folded into the new Image Search. I would guess that this technology, especially if coupled with geotagging, would offer way better results for landscape photography than for running shoes. Even so, this is likely to help consumers and hurt merchants.

Which merchants? A photographer friend thinks the new Google Image Search will make it much harder to make a living selling photographs. If a visual similarity search is actually effective, it will pull the rug out of the fine art photography market.
1. Find awesome image from top pro commanding $1500 for a print
2. Do "similar image" search
3. Find similarly awesome image from some amateur wanting $250 for a print.
4. See top pros suddenly offering a lot more workshops and photo tours.

Sgt_Kickaxe




msg:4191174
 11:01 pm on Aug 23, 2010 (gmt 0)

You see a picture of your favorite star. You say "ooo, I like that shirt". You click on it and end up with image search results ready to be purchased.

It's not hard to see why Google wants this, question is, will we now see Like.com results added to the long list of CRAP I DIDN'T ASK FOR mixed in with the top 10 results? Betcha we do...

Gian04




msg:4191228
 1:43 am on Aug 24, 2010 (gmt 0)

Like is also the text in a FB Fan page (widget) button

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved