maximillianos
msg:3290031 | 6:24 pm on Mar 22, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Nice. I new I should have went to law school. Though I do like my career as a publisher...;-)
|
rarethings55
msg:3290194 | 8:52 pm on Mar 22, 2007 (gmt 0) |
This literally just made my day.
|
Keniki
msg:3290341 | 11:45 pm on Mar 22, 2007 (gmt 0) |
What a great time it must be right now to be a lawyer specialising in the internet.......... They must be making a fortune.
|
Clark
msg:3290812 | 11:49 am on Mar 23, 2007 (gmt 0) |
This DMCA thing clearly needs work.
Anyone who finds these topics interesting btw, should never miss Mark Cuban's blog.
|
skunker
msg:3290873 | 1:18 pm on Mar 23, 2007 (gmt 0) |
Are activists becoming the new extremists? Geez....can't tell the difference sometimes.
|
alexdino1
msg:3290954 | 2:52 pm on Mar 23, 2007 (gmt 0) |
I still have a problem with the whole "it's ok to publish content on my site until the owner tells me to take it down". A lot of money is being made on OPW (Other people's work). That being said...I love YouTube.
|
tedster
msg:3298475 | 5:58 pm on Mar 31, 2007 (gmt 0) |
The story continues... an incisive response from Google's legal counsel, Michael Kwun: | In February, after negotiations broke down, Viacom requested that YouTube take down more than 100,000 videos. We did so immediately, working through a weekend. Viacom later withdrew some of those requests, apparently realizing that those videos were not infringing, after all. Though Viacom seems unable to determine what constitutes infringing content, its lawyers believe that we should have the responsibility and ability to do it for them. Washington Post article [washingtonpost.com] |
|
|
|
