homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.141.230
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Website
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: goodroi

Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues Forum

    
YouTube Pays Off Labels with $50m
Equity Stake Golden Payoff
trillianjedi




msg:3127170
 4:33 pm on Oct 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

According to the New York Times:-

Three of the four major music companies ó Vivendiís Universal Music Group, Sony and Bertelsmannís jointly owned Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and the Warner Music Group ó each quietly negotiated to take small stakes in YouTube as part of video and music-licensing deals they struck shortly before the sale, people involved in the talks said yesterday. The music companies collectively stand to receive as much as $50 million from these arrangements, these people said.

Full Article [nytimes.com]

It seems a little shady to me given that it's only the big labels that got a slice of the action. I guess the others can be paid off easily, but I'm not sure how I feel about that.

However if this proves to be a litigation-busting move then it will certainly shut up the critics.

 

MrSpeed




msg:3127277
 6:01 pm on Oct 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

So does this mean I can continue to upload Wham! videos?

graywolf




msg:3127577
 9:37 pm on Oct 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

MR Speed you better wake up before you go-go ... ;-)

{ducks and runs for cover}

mr_lumpy




msg:3127732
 11:30 pm on Oct 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

Any chance to see more videos of Andrew Ridgeley lip-syncing is welcome.

;)

martinibuster




msg:3127737
 11:32 pm on Oct 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

50 million is a small sum of money, even smaller when split between those companies.

Bennie




msg:3127757
 12:01 am on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

LMAO @ graywolf

icedout




msg:3127828
 1:16 am on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

I guess Marc Cuban wasn't aware of this little deal - yeah it really does seem like a tiny amount of money, but of course this is equity which is bound to grow with the company owned by Google...

icedout




msg:3127834
 1:24 am on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

ok, what if Youtube worked out a deal with copyright owners that they would share the adsense revenue with them for all content that they have rights too? wouldn't that be great for every one and save Youtube from a lawsuit caused demise?

rohitj




msg:3128294
 11:43 am on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

The opportunity goes well beyond "adsense revenue." This isn't your typical website -- 50 million is a small sum but i'm sure that there's still a few restrictions that come with this deal. Something has to be wrong the day I can upload several hours of content without any consequence.

System
redhat



msg:3128419
 12:18 pm on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

The following message was cut out to new thread by engine. New thread at: goog/3128417.htm [webmasterworld.com]
2:27 pm on Oct. 20, 2006 (utc +1)

MrSpeed




msg:3128432
 1:32 pm on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Record companies have benefited from investments in online companies before. In 1999, EMI made $40 million literally overnight by selling part of its stake in Musicmaker.com during its first trading day. That sum dwarfed the companyís earnings from American CD sales for the entire first half of that year.

At first I though 25 million was peanuts as well. But if $40 million "dwarfs" earnings from American CD sales then maybe $25 million is a fair shake?

Also the article mentions revunue sharing from ads.

Where the hell does all the money go to for a $17 CD?

skibum




msg:3128517
 2:10 pm on Oct 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

hmmm wonder what the YouTube valuation was when that 50 million was worth 50 milion. Did that turn into multiples when the sale went through or was it 50M of a 1.6B company?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google Finance, Govt, Policy and Business Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved