homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.7.136
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Bing Search Engine News
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mack

Bing Search Engine News Forum

This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: 32 ( [1] 2 > >     
Optimizing for Microsoft Search
rnpsoft




msg:1540326
 11:53 am on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

It's clear that Microsoft won't tell us anything about their algo. It's also sure that on this stage we only have some ideas which it's quite difficult to proof.

I really think that the first step would be to put all this information together.

Let's see how fast we can be...

 

Receptional




msg:1540327
 12:29 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

Hi there rpnsoft and welcome to WebmasterWorld. Thanks for joining us.

You first... ;)

Dixon.

rnpsoft




msg:1540328
 1:27 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

When you start with a new problem the first phase would be to read what all others said about that topic.
This is what I tried to do and I suppose I'm not the only one.

However the most active topic is the one where we offer feedback to the ms-team even if most of the visitors of this forum would like to read a topic like this one (my opinion).

Try to search in MSN for:
"Optimizing for Microsoft Search".
At the time when I write this message you'll find no result.
Let's see how fast MSN index our topic.

The MSN doesn't provide a pagerank tool like google does. But could be the "Updated recently" slide bar which will help us to make some test pages and see the results quick enough to move this topic forward.

rnpsoft




msg:1540329
 2:32 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

According to:
[blogs.msdn.com...]

"One factor our Beta uses in ranking pages is the text of links that point to a page. If many links to a site contain a certain word or phrase, that site will rank highly in a query for that word or phrase."

petehall




msg:1540330
 2:57 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

Popularity is a new ingenious factor, so gather all of your friends and spend a few months clicking on your links :-)

I wonder how they decide how popular a site is... it almost makes me wonder if they are buying data from a third party.

What a great system, and anyone who doesn't like the idea can chose to view less popular sites only!

At last we have some choice about the results that we see. The user is now making decisions rather than the search engine doing all the work. Brilliant!

willybfriendly




msg:1540331
 3:01 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

But what is "popularity"?

I do not see that it is how often a site is visited.

G purportedly uses "link popularity", or how often a site is linked to. Isn't it more likely that this is what M$ is using?

WBF

rnpsoft




msg:1540332
 3:25 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

This is what they mean by Popularity: (just click 'Learn more' in the Search Builder->Results ranking view)

"To add emphasis to sites by the number of other sites that link to them, move the middle slider up."

petehall




msg:1540333
 4:04 pm on Nov 16, 2004 (gmt 0)

This is what they mean by Popularity: (just click 'Learn more' in the Search Builder->Results ranking view)
"To add emphasis to sites by the number of other sites that link to them, move the middle slider up."

You're quite correct, please accept my apologies! I made an assumption about this which I should not have done.

I still think its great giving people the option.

Something msndude might want to know; the description of how these sliders work are incorrect. 1 and 3 should be swapped:

1)To modify your search to add emphasis to sites that have been recently added to the search index, move the first slider up.
3)To put the most emphasis on the match between your exact search words and your results, move the third slider up. This will de-emphasize the two other rankings as search parameters.

Unless it is my sliders that are mixed up and not the description :-)

Hardwood Guy




msg:1540334
 11:52 am on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

"the text of links that point to a page"

Internal link text seems to be a key ingredient by the looks of the new MSN search--at least from my view.

rnpsoft




msg:1540335
 12:08 pm on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Searching now in MSN for "Optimizing for Microsoft Search" returns already our thread. Seems that in max. 48 hours the page it's full indexed.

Google doesn't know our page yet...

whiterabbit




msg:1540336
 1:15 pm on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Google doesn't know our page yet...

and thats NOT the beta search! The result points to Receptionals profile.

Its really nice to see relevant, up-to-date results in a search engine isn't it, hang on, this is the MS forum, not the G forum.

Are MS teaching us the true meaning of duality? love/hate

Tony

kevinpate




msg:1540337
 1:25 pm on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

> Google doesn't know our page yet...

Oddly enough, yeah, G knows
Using the four word thread title, G just delivered
two results: a link to this thread and a link to the active post list
7:20 am Daylight Savings Time, Central USA time zone

whiterabbit




msg:1540338
 4:28 pm on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Ah yes, there it is, limping in in second place, ah well better late than never I suppose ;)

soapystar




msg:1540339
 6:56 pm on Nov 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

sure..works fine for non-optimised phrases.....pretty primitive for anything else....

Hugene




msg:1540340
 8:20 pm on Nov 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

I noticed that when you search with : widget {popl=0} {frsh=0} {mtch=100} the results that pop-up are the ones containing the widget keyword in the title and url. Conclusion, match characteristics are MOST influenced by url and title.

Another thing; keyword spamming at the bottom of pages seem to be fine for MSN (for now though, I am not sure how much longer that will be)

Hugene




msg:1540341
 8:20 pm on Nov 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

Also, we need someone to write a msn ranking web utility, that would help a lot.

Rollo




msg:1540342
 10:08 pm on Nov 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

The new MSN search seems to weight meta titles, domain name, and on-page content very highly. Inbound links don't seem to function at all the way they do in Google.

petehall




msg:1540343
 10:30 pm on Nov 23, 2004 (gmt 0)

The new MSN search seems to weight meta titles, domain name, and on-page content very highly. Inbound links don't seem to function at all the way they do in Google.

This is not what I am seeing.

Volumes of inbound links have a huge effect on current rankings.

luckychucky




msg:1540344
 1:39 pm on Nov 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

Also, we need someone to write a msn ranking web utility, that would help a lot.

Amen, brother. Testify

soapystar




msg:1540345
 3:20 pm on Nov 24, 2004 (gmt 0)

>>>Volumes of inbound links have a huge effect on current rankings.

it just the sorting of value for those links is not on a par with google which is why authority sites arent doing well....seems sheer weight in numbers of identical links from anywhere is all it takes....

RonPK




msg:1540346
 10:13 am on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

I agree with soapystar. Search for a non-English word, and many top-10s will be dominated by English pages having one occurence of the keyword, buried deep down in the text.

Also, IMHO <title> seems almost irrelevant, and certainly much less important than in G.

OddDog




msg:1540347
 11:43 am on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

in non competitive key words I have the impression that on page factors have a higher weighting in the new beta msn search than in google.

several sites results confirm this for me.

sandalwood




msg:1540348
 10:19 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Hey u all...

Just one thing:
I really hope the new msnbot to have as much bugs as most win* products do...

Nikke




msg:1540349
 1:27 am on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

The location of the server seems to be weighted in.

Compare your keywords between
beta.search.msn.com
beta.search.msn.co.uk
beta.search.msn.se

A server physically located in Sweden doesn't stand a chance on the first two (with a two-word English phrase), but ranks #2 for the same phrase on .se

For Swedish phrases servers located in Spain and UK ranks better on the UK site, while the server located in Sweden ranks well on .COM...

Also, I find quite a few tracker links (affiliate links routed via a click counter) in the serps. This is of course nice for well SEOed affiliate sites, but maybe not for merchants with aff programs.

tenerifejim




msg:1540350
 12:22 pm on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Nikke,

I agree, this appears to be the opposite of how google works. In my experience, on google, a website hosted in Spain, about Spain ranks higher than one hosted in France, about Spain.

MSN seems to use the location of the searcher to determine relevance. A website hosted in France, about Spain will ranking higher for searchers in France than a website hosted in Spain.

percentages




msg:1540351
 12:27 pm on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Ohhhhh Gooooodm

There is si much danger in the speculation.

Sit bacjj, relax, and eait fot the dreams.


Ready? or not!

billygg




msg:1540352
 1:39 pm on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

i know, form my personal site, that msn is definitely liking text links pointing to my site, my site does very well for the keywords that are in the text links. i have even added a few pages to my site in the last couple weeks, and i didnt add meta tags to those pages yet, and they are in the top 2 pages of msn's beta index for some competative keywords. looks like it likes links pointing to index as apposed to subpages. seeing no links point the the new subpage i created, yet excellent placement.

phantombookman




msg:1540353
 2:28 pm on Dec 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

my 5 main sites all return at #1 for my keywords so I am over the moon, however..

I have mentioned this a couple of times, I am not seeing a lot of sites showing that should do (presumably they have not submitted and are awaiting a natural crawl)

I think until they include a lot more sites nothing can be considered conclusive
Regards
Rod

Receptional




msg:1540354
 11:12 am on Dec 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

presumably they have not submitted and are awaiting a natural crawl

I doubt that many sites of note have not been crawled by now by MSNbot. So they just must be badly optimised for the new engine.

Just be happy Phantom if you are beating the big boys, and hope it will continue.

I am in the UK so it doesn't work with me yet, but I would seriously consider creating pages which are geo-trageted in nature to all zip codes in which you operate if you want to get serious. That "near me" button will potential become a massive discriminator.

rj87uk




msg:1540355
 11:54 am on Dec 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

That "near me" button will potential become a massive discriminator.

where is that button now? I seem to have lost it be seen it before...?

This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: 32 ( [1] 2 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Bing Search Engine News
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved