mattglet
msg:291686 | 5:46 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Steelers, 30-24
|
bakedjake
msg:291687 | 5:52 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
You don't understand my pain seeing the Steelers go to the big game. Seahawks by 3, 24-21.
|
Vampyre
msg:291688 | 6:47 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Seahawks, 24-17
|
Prolific
msg:291689 | 6:52 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Seahawks 28 to 10 :)
|
jimbeetle
msg:291690 | 6:55 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
I just hate the Steelers going in as the favorite, think they play much better as the underdog. Anyway, Steelers in a nailbiter, 27 - 24.
|
bruhaha
msg:291691 | 7:04 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Steelers 30-20
|
Lyndsay
msg:291692 | 8:46 pm on Jan 23, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Go Seahawks!
|
skibum
msg:291693 | 6:47 am on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Would much rather see the Steelers as the underdog, seems to give em' a mental edge. 6th seed favored over the 1st seed seems odd.
|
Timotheos
msg:291694 | 8:00 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| "I think [former Raiders receiver] Tim Brown said it the best," Alexander said. "He said, 'I love the Seahawks and I love what they do, but I've beat them so many times that I just can't pick them.' I laughed about it, but I was like, 'I understand.' |
|
Seahawks are my team! Gonna get some respect for once. Seahawks 30, Steelers 21 Can't wait!
|
bruhaha
msg:291695 | 8:18 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| 6th seed favored over the 1st seed seems odd |
|
Yeah, except when you consider how mid-season injuries can depress the overall record of a VERY good (Steelers) team. Here in Philly we're sorry last year's potential all PA matchup hasn't worked out yet, but it still gives us an instate team to support. The only thing that makes me nervous about rooting for the Steelers is that I've rooted for the loosing side in every one of their Super Bowls (mainly because as a kid I really admired Tom Landry & Roger Staubach..)
|
glenn
msg:291696 | 9:07 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Steelers by 21
|
mattglet
msg:291697 | 9:25 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| 6th seed favored over the 1st seed seems odd |
|
Except when you look at the (team) talent pool in the NFC, then compare it to the AFC. Not even close.
|
4crests
msg:291698 | 9:46 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
SEAHAWKS-27 steelers-24
|
Rugles
msg:291699 | 10:11 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Seahawks 31 - 28 Field goal in overtime!
|
BadSense
msg:291700 | 10:22 pm on Jan 24, 2006 (gmt 0) |
My gut tells me Pittsburgh will win. However, my concern is who will win against the spread. I follow my friend's picks religiously (who's made a living off of sports betting), so I'm still waiting for him to let me know of his pick. <snip>
I went 1-1 last week - nailed Seattle, but lost on the Under to the first game. To conclude, for next year...go Eagles! [edited by: lawman at 10:29 pm (utc) on Jan. 24, 2006]
|
Rugles
msg:291701 | 7:50 pm on Jan 25, 2006 (gmt 0) |
>>>To conclude, for next year...go Eagles! Go Bills!
|
bobothecat
msg:291702 | 11:13 am on Jan 26, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Seahawks 21 - Steelers 10 Go Seahawks! and Go Giants for the next season. :)
|
moishe
msg:291703 | 9:33 pm on Jan 28, 2006 (gmt 0) |
24-21 Seattle. That having been stated, I would root against the Steelers if the opposing team was coached by Osama Bin Laden with a team made up entirely of members of the Taliban. Go Browns! (someday, maybe, if no one steals the team again....)
|
garyr_h
msg:291704 | 6:09 am on Jan 29, 2006 (gmt 0) |
I think the streakers will win against the police 2: 1 this year... errr.. Hopefully Seahawks, but seeing as how my team never wins in any sport, (except back in the Jordan years): Steelers in a wopper, 34-14.
|
Timotheos
msg:291705 | 4:45 am on Feb 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Looks like Prolific was the closest. Congrats to the Steelers! ...
Was it just me or did the officiating suck! Must go and lick my sores now after my team lost ;-)
|
DrDoc
msg:291706 | 7:53 am on Feb 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
I'd venture a guess and say ... Steelers, about 21-10?
;)
|
bill
msg:291707 | 8:59 am on Feb 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Did the Patriots win again?
|
bakedjake
msg:291708 | 5:53 pm on Feb 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
GO BROWNS!
|
mattglet
msg:291709 | 7:23 pm on Feb 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| Looks like Prolific was the closest. |
|
If only Seattle won ;)
|
skibum
msg:291710 | 2:42 am on Feb 7, 2006 (gmt 0) |
One for the thumb and one for the other ring finger next year. :)
|
4crests
msg:291711 | 12:47 am on Feb 11, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Steelers 21 ---- Seahawks 10 --- Refs 21
|
|
