homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.17.79.35
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Foo Forum

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31 ( [1] 2 > >     
Resurrecting an old discussion in a way
vkaryl




msg:295596
 5:49 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

about what to call yourself (as in web designer, webmaster, or not, etc.):

Ran across this one somewhere late last night, and I quite like it - it's a bit "old world" yet conveys a totality, I think: "web craftsman".

I think I'll adopt it posthaste....

 

pendanticist




msg:295597
 5:54 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Ah, the lack of gender neutrality. Webicist or Webnition roll of the tongue pretty nicely. :)

Might give the true linguist cause for pause though. <chuckle> But hey, new words are coined frequently.

pmkpmk




msg:295598
 7:27 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

A friend of mine - she's doing all the tech stuff for a punk record label - calls herself "Web Mistress".

vkaryl




msg:295599
 7:55 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hey, if I'm female and don't worry about "gender neutral"....! I don't really. If I was already using "webmaster", "web craftsman" isn't worse.... and actually does cover a lot more territory.

Around here, "web mistress" always gets you raised eyebrows....

pmkpmk




msg:295600
 8:52 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

Nothing wrong with raised eyebrows - nothing is worse than leaving NO impression at all... Of course you have to back it up with at least twice the knowledge and hard work than any male competitor. But isn't that always the case for any female who is not working as a secretary?

olwen




msg:295601
 9:00 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

I favour "Internet Specialist"

pmkpmk




msg:295602
 9:09 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

In a former life I worked as a freelance journalist, and I got invited to a Windows-95-is-still-not-finished-but-let's-have-a-good-time conference to Redmond. There I met a "Technical Evangelist" - which kind of impressed me back then.

Nevertheless, the folk at Microsoft seem to be very religious [microsoft.com].

httpwebwitch




msg:295603
 9:49 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

"digitarian"
"codemonkey"
"pixel jockey"

Syzygy




msg:295604
 11:16 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

"Web site designer"...
"Web site creator"...

Syzygy

lZakl




msg:295605
 11:41 pm on Mar 8, 2005 (gmt 0)

"web craftsman" isn't worse.... and actually does cover a lot more territory.

What about "omniwebmaster"? I think that covers even more ;0)

-- Zak

gamiziuk




msg:295606
 12:21 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

"Meta webmaster"

vkaryl




msg:295607
 1:36 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Well, the point (for me anyway) was to get away from "webmaster" and NOT head for "webmistress"....

Okay, in the interests of "non-gender-specificity": web crafter?

pendanticist




msg:295608
 2:31 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Webicist, Webnition, Web Craftsman, Digitarian, Codemonkey, Pixel Jockey, Omniwebmaster, Web Crafter

Well, since this is your thread, why not do something like WordGame?

Everyone adds their version and only YOU get to delete the ones you don't want? Might get some good ideas that are acceptable.

Others can speak their piece and you can only delete. <- Almost poetic, ain't it?

Then paste back in the ones you like.

Jusssst a thought. :)

WA_Smith




msg:295609
 2:46 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Most people are so nice in what they call me in my capacity as a web something. I have been called many things I like it when people pay me and call me something ... its not about the name its about the money.

pendanticist




msg:295610
 2:50 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Foo refuses to be monetized.

pmkpmk




msg:295611
 8:35 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Is "wizard" gender specific? In a technical way it is, of course, but if you read standard literature (Tolkien, Pratchett), Wizards seem to be rather neutrum.

So would "Web Wizard" or even "World Wide Web Wizard" be an option?

Mr_Brutal




msg:295612
 10:03 am on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hows about NETMASTER!

limbo




msg:295613
 12:12 pm on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

webnimbler

Syzygy




msg:295614
 12:52 pm on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

web weaver...

vkaryl




msg:295615
 3:49 pm on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

That's nice, Syzygy. So is "web wizard" pmkpmk.

Yes, "wizard" does seem to be an accepted nonspecific. Unlike witch, and when I run across that used to refer to a man, it always throws me....

Milamber




msg:295616
 4:35 pm on Mar 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

don't forget webmagi, websorcerer and webwarlock ;)
I like Webwizard, I'm sure some of the things that people here do seem like magic to others.
[webmasterworld.com ]

2by4




msg:295617
 5:07 am on Mar 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

I've always liked webmaster.

But please, whatever you do, don't call me a web designer. Typical conversation at a party:

q: what do you do?
a: I do web stuff [trying to keep it non-technical]
q: oh, you mean you're a web designer?
a: NO, I'm not a web designer. A designer is someone who designs the surface of the site. I make it run.

So I'd say:
I make it run == webmaster, or whatever term you prefer instead;

Marcia




msg:295618
 10:00 pm on Mar 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

I like netfashionist a lot. That way you could have web design and affiliate shlock on the same site. Putting it in a theme pyramid would work just fine.

Leosghost




msg:295619
 11:50 am on Mar 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

HTML juggler ;-)

Code juggler ;-)

netfashionist
there's probably someone registering the dot com right now...

Ps .I always thought it was spelt "schlock"? .

vkaryl




msg:295620
 3:52 pm on Mar 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

I think it's schlock, yes - but then it's kind of one of those words which seems to have not only variable spelling but variable meaning.... like "dreck"....

I'm opting for Web Wizard for my new cards I think. Nicely gender neutral (as pointed out earlier), and while "netfashionist" is also gn, it comes across to me as female and somehow "precious". Perhaps because I started life as an interior designer? Among other things....

httpwebwitch




msg:295621
 1:56 am on Mar 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Unlike witch, and when I run across that used to refer to a man, it always throws me....

It's something you get used to.

vkaryl




msg:295622
 3:13 am on Mar 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

webwitch: I've been "thrown" by that for 40+ years or so.... I don't think it's going to improve before I die and decompose to component atoms....

By that, one assumes you must be male? Of course, assumptions are singularly stupid....

ken_b




msg:295623
 4:23 am on Mar 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

I prefer webklutz.

If you've seen my site you'll know just how fitting the title is.

vkaryl




msg:295624
 4:30 am on Mar 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Hmmm. Kenb, you've set my imagination onto a whole other track here....

pendanticist




msg:295625
 4:55 am on Mar 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Let's seeee, would one who runs a Directory be a Webrarian?

Then those who run ESL sites would be Webguists and those who run Cartoon sites might be called Webtoonists.

If you're a heavy Hemi fan you'd then be a WebisphericalChamberist, or, on the other hand, if you ran a Nutritional site, you'd be a Webasnackist.

"Look that up in your Funk and Wagnall's!" Long time quote from SNL.

If you ran a Goth site you could call yourself a Nut. Sometimes you feel that way, sometimes you don't, you know.

If you ran a Heavy Metal Band site, you might then wish to call yourself a WebHuhWhatchusayist

Individual results may vary. Plus tax and F.I.C.A., mounting and balance extra. Do not try this at home....

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31 ( [1] 2 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved