| 4:34 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Aw, come on Macguru! What kind of game is that? There has been at least one update related post in the recent posts list now since I can remember. I know why you posted this. I'm seeing the same thing you are and I thought there was a new policy in place about combining those threads.
P.S. There are five of them right now as of 2002-10-30 at 08:32-0800.
| 4:45 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
bit of a special month this one though... Besides- if you can't beat them...
| 4:49 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
aren't you going to stipulate what order the active thread should be in. ;)
| 4:52 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Beat me to it DaveN, I was just adding the finishing touches on my jpg - 20/page, sorted by Forum, ascending.
| 4:56 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I was just going to bump twenty FOO posts but then thought better of it ;)
| 4:59 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Macguru, how about this thread, is it update related? :)
| 5:24 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
|Ok, the first member to post a link to some non edited screen shot of the active list without any Google update related topic, wins! |
Google update threads - the bane of Webmaster World, IMHO. They just start getting REAL old after a while. But I guess not everyone agrees or they wouldn't keep popping up. They have killed my interest in the active list, though, that's for sure.
| 5:45 pm on Oct 30, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Woould it be considered rude to send a sticky to all members asking them to stop responding update threadas for 10 minutes? ;)