homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.204.231.253
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & jatar k & martinibuster

Google AdSense Forum

    
Should I take the plunge?
Remove annoying ad block and halve profits to improve the user experience?
notredamekid




msg:1451495
 10:01 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

I'm facing a dilemma.

Our story: My partner and I have painstakingly built 3 high quality content sites over the past 14 months.

Three months ago, we overhauled the layout to make room for more, and better placed, Adsense units. We used channel analysis to maximize our CTR (and thus CPM) which is now at obscene levels.

The upside:
We're halfway to the UPS club. The money we bring in allows us to pay writers to create more high quality content, and also invest in link building.

The downside:
One of the three adsense units looks pretty darn spammy. This ad unit certainly annoys users and make our site less useful to them.

Aside from that, I believe Google may eventually use user behavior analysis (collected from toolbar, etc.) as a way to improve search quality. While the average visitor used to view 2 pages and stay for 2:30, they now view 1.5 pages and stay for 1:45. So I am thinking the bad user experience could hurt our rankings in this way.

Further, our spammy look makes it so that other sites never link to us. Over the past month, we've gotten close to 20K visitors and published about 30 articles, but have not received a single organic (passively obtained) backlink to an internal page! (The main page lacks the spammy looking ads, so it still picks up the occasional passive link).

Thus we are facing a choice: (1) Keep the "spammy-looking" ad unit up, and use that revenue to build links and more content, or (2) take the spammy ad unit down so that the user experience improves and we receive more organic backlinks. Keep in mind the second option means 2K (40%) less in revenue each month.

Help! What should I do?

 

bbkid




msg:1451496
 10:05 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Whats the most important thing to you?

Myself, I have one add right after my first story and a few affiliate links in the side bar. Actualy, theres only two affiliate links and then a couple of get firefox type or links

Everything blends in nicely and I dont have to indredible of a ctr, but im happy with what I get.

notredamekid




msg:1451497
 10:11 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Well, long term financial success is most important.

The thing is, an extra 2K / month in profits can probably buy more links than we're losing by having the ad unit there.

TheRookie




msg:1451498
 10:17 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

If that's true, then I think you answered your question.

incrediBILL




msg:1451499
 10:20 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

If it cuts into my revenue I keep the ads unless the "experience" pays the bills.

Ever see a newspaper or a magazine?

They're a spammy as it gets and people just keep buying them.

Take the money and run.

diamondgrl




msg:1451500
 10:55 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Well, I would defend newspapers and magazines, at least the most professional ones. They have strict rules on where ads appear and how they look. And they stick with them.

I understand your dilemma and in the end, you have to make it a profitable venture, but if you can do anything to redesign the site to promote advertising but still make it a good user experience, I would try. I, for one, will not create a site that is not intended for user satisfaction above everything else.

homeblock




msg:1451501
 1:24 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

I balance my sites.

If one is really performing and growing well in a quarter then I feel like I have the flexibility to make the user experience on another site better by getting rid of ads... sometimes completely.

My thinking is that I'm not greedy and next quarter I might be able to easily ad spam both sites once the later has grown.

notredamekid




msg:1451502
 2:18 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Yes, we have three main sites, and the tentative plan is to take the spam ads off of one, and see how many organic links we pick up because of it.

If we don't get any organic backlinks, the spam ads are going back up fast!

hunderdown




msg:1451503
 3:16 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

notredamekids, I think you ask an important question, which I'm approaching from the other direction. Since I joined AdSense in Oct. 2003 I've been very cautious about how I use it, and haven't ventured beyond a single narrow skyscraper block on the left side of some, but not all, pages.

Putting an AdLinks block on the home page has been a big plus, though, and now I'm wondering what else I can do. I need to redesign the site to help people move through it, and I can see I need to think about how to best use AdSense at the same time--I'm not at your level but the latest changes have me in sight of $400/month and suspecting that I can do better still.

But as you note, any change has side-effects. Finding the right balance is tricky.

hyperkik




msg:1451504
 4:22 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

You can also experiment with approaches that may be less spammy, such as using a left-side skyscraper instead of sticking the big ad block at the top of the article.

I wouldn't worry about Google punishing a site for not holding onto its readers. I understand Google to be pushing the top, center placement of big ad blocks, as the best performing for webmasters. (Take a look at their heat map.)

hyperkik




msg:1451505
 4:26 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

I should add, if your content is good and your readers motivated, you should be able to find a layout that doesn't look spammy while still providing good performance. I would assume that I could improve my site's performance by following the "big ad block, top center" approach, but I prefer a more subdued approach and, fortunately, it gives pretty good results.

notredamekid




msg:1451506
 4:58 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)


You can also experiment with approaches that may be less spammy, such as using a left-side skyscraper instead of sticking the big ad block at the top of the article.

lol, we do both. How else do we get 14% CTR?

OCSupertones




msg:1451507
 12:39 am on May 26, 2005 (gmt 0)

Keep the ads. You don't want this work to be a volunteer website do you?

I make some sites for money, and some for fun, and ministry.

The sites for money, make money. They make money at all costs (keeping it white hat, nothing illegal, no spam), but the other sites for fun don't have ads.

That is where I find my balance. From what you have said, your site is about making money. Why would you want to cut that in half?

If you removed all of your ads, do you think visitors would pay to read your material? I doubt they would pay the same as adsense does.

jhood




msg:1451508
 3:18 am on May 26, 2005 (gmt 0)

Are you sure the spammy ad block is working? I have experimented with just about every size and placement and have found the wide skyscraper down the left hand side is the hands-down winner. This is on a content-heavy, largely textual site with 12,000 or so pages. No sense cluttering up the page with stuff that isn't working. It would be better to put a good banner ad in one of those slots.

As for declining backlinks, you're probably paying the price of being around for awhile. Those who were likely to link to you without prompting have already done so. Thus the rate of new links will fall, regardless of what you do.

Personally, I ignore backlinks. Que sera sera, or something like that.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved