| 12:41 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Yes, it can be done, but is impossible as Google has written the script.
I will not claim my $50 :-) but I am sorry but this is false.
It is possible, and Google does it.
start.htm has a link to www.a.com/page.htm
I have PM-ed you the URL of a page that demonstrates this.
Feel free to link to www.a.com/page.htm from any page, this will still work.
The additional trick that Google does is that the first JS then calls a second JS passing the referrer as a parameter on the URL.
| 1:48 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Frox it's not $50 but $100. Congratulations, well proven ;)
| 2:02 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
If frox won't take you up on your offer I will:
On domaina.com: test.js:
e.g. document.write('<img src=http://domainc.com/reftrack/?ref='+escape(document.referer)+'>');
Google DOES track the refering URL. I bet this is useful for smart pricing and fraud prevention.
So it IS possible for google to pay less for referals form yahoo, though I doubt it is clear cut as that. Maybe referals from yahoo convert worse, or they can look at the keyword from yahoo.
In fact this has rather big implications for google's knowledge of the web, for every site that has adsense on it, they know where all of your traffic comes from.
| 2:21 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|Frox it's not $50 but $100. |
Well, maybe then I'll claim them :-)
I won't go in details here, but google is collecting a lot of information about you, and your configuration.
The first use I would do of all these information is "fingerprinting" against simple click-fraud
| 2:24 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Yep, it would help a lot against click fraud.
But also very useful for say comparing referers of yahoo, msn in terms of keywords and traffic levels :)
| 2:30 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Ok, who will be the first to complain with Google about this? :-)
Thinking about this, this behaviour of Google COULD (could) make us break our own privacy policies, as we are giving to Google some information about our visitors' browsing history. I have some sites where I explicitely say I would not do such a thing, and will have to change that...
| 4:32 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|I have PM-ed you the URL of a page that demonstrates this. |
I stand corrected... PM your paypal addy
Kudos to you guys for proving me wrong. It's a topic that has come up in the past & has always ended up being that Google was not collecting that info. I guess that means either they weren't then, or that no one noticed the document.referrer passed along your page referer instead of your page.
Anyone know of an old posting of show_ads.js to see if was being used back then, or if it's only been used recently?
| 5:22 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|Thinking about this, this behaviour of Google COULD (could) make us break our own privacy policies, as we are giving to Google some information about our visitors' browsing history. I have some sites where I explicitely say I would not do such a thing, and will have to change that... |
Question: are we giving that information to Google, or are our visitors?
| 8:02 pm on Apr 9, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Wow, I appreciate it. PM on the way!
Or should I also feel ok to install a spyware on the users's PC? That's client-side too! :-)
| 1:01 am on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|PM your paypal addy |
Wow, I appreciate it. PM on the way!
Money sent :(
| 1:28 am on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
OK , Now lets look at the second part of my question.. that you could get EPC of differing amounts based on referral (In My case lower EPC on Yahoo traffic) .. could it be that G is doing just that .
I seen clear evidence in my case that that happened .. it was easy to detect because the site page had so few visitors and they came from G ..
then last weeks Y update my ranking moved first page for main keyword and traffic multiplied X 10 or so and EPC dropped like a rock from x$ to pennnies.
Now 95% of traffic from Y and 5% from G
But I dont know what they would gain from lowering EPC based on a referral other than G?
Probably has nothing to do with it..but it seems to be much more than just a coincidence
And Kudo's MrAnchovy for standing by your bet!
| 3:24 am on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
dauction, I don't think it's that clear cut as you had a large incrase of traffic. Supply/demand is probally more of an issue.
To test this properly is to use channels and assign google a channel, and yahoo a channel then you will know for sure.
| 9:45 am on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
mrAnchovy, thanks! :-)
dauction, it is quite frequently reported that an increase in traffic results in a drecrease in EPC.
Call it smart pricing, call it a conspiracy (I don't anyway see any logic in this) but it seems to be real.
I also had similar feelings, although it's of cource VERY difficoult to show wether this is truew or not.
As per the yahoo vs google, if your pages are for example php, as already suggested you could:
1) prepare two (better three) custom channels
2) when your page is called:
if referrer=yahoo then include adsense_ yahoo elseif referrer=googe then include adsense_google else then include adsense_other
after a few days this shoud be quite clearly visible.
I can't do this because the percentage of my non-google referrers is bell below 1%!
| 8:29 pm on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
If you think about it, it makes sense for Yahoo to yield a higher CTR at least. Yahoo is a terrible search engine. The only people who use it are those who don't know any better. They are likely to be new users, and thus haven't learned to ignore ads yet. From there, you can assume that it's possible that dodgy ads will have a higher CPM than fully legit. ones, as dodgy business tends to be more profitable. And it strikes me as far more likely that a new user (Yahoo) will click on something like "earn 70,000 per second sitting in front of the TV and eating" than a slightly more experienced user (Google). Just my theory :)
| 8:54 pm on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Frox the pages are not .php so how can I can about setting up a channels for G and Y ; I do think it's worth looking at ..
| 10:46 pm on Apr 10, 2005 (gmt 0)|
All you need is just inserting something like
block for first channel
block for second channel
So, you should perhaps ask Google if they find it legitimate..
| This 46 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 46 ( 1  ) |