jardin
msg:1379898 | 11:34 am on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Nice numbers. Let's say it is 77%, that's pretty good, isn't it? Considering Google has to do a lot of work behind the scenes..
|
howiejs
msg:1379899 | 12:51 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
This is off. From last year I think I remember Ask Jeeves was gettting 90% Bigger publishers will reall skew this number.
|
Freedom
msg:1379900 | 2:43 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Agree. Big publishers, the really big boys, are going to skew those numbers to that 77 percent since they can negotiate for a higher pay out. The rest of us are getting around 60 to 67 percent.
|
OptiRex
msg:1379901 | 3:28 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| The average per publisher - assuming circa 20,000 publishers - is $18,885 per year. |
|
Surely going by the cheque numbers issued the figure must be nearer 44,000?
|
howiejs
msg:1379902 | 3:34 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Freedom "The rest of us are getting around 60 to 67 percent." where is this number coming from?
|
Freedom
msg:1379903 | 4:59 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I didn't bookmark all the threads and posts where these figures were discussed and generally agreed upon by some reputable members on this. Like everything else at webmasterworld, it's an opinion, but one of those that is stronger then most. The conpiracy theorists, newbies, Google haters, ex AS publishers and all around crack pots who love to read their own posts will probably disagree.
|
FromRocky
msg:1379904 | 5:48 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Assumptions: Overall Payout = 77%
Big publishers ~ 90% Us, small publishers - payout? Us/(overal publisher) Payout %
30% ----------------> 47%
40% ----------------> 58%
50% ----------------> 64%
60% ----------------> 68%
70% ----------------> 71% Pick your number
|
oddsod
msg:1379905 | 6:09 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Surely going by the cheque numbers issued the figure must be nearer 44,000? |
|
Not in 2004, AFAIK.
|
OptiRex
msg:1379906 | 8:28 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| Surely going by the cheque numbers issued the figure must be nearer 44,000? |
|
The difference between my January and February 2005 cheque numbers is 44,135. That's all I have to go on and I have to assume that cheques are issued consecutively. Not to worry, still interesting figures.
|
thewonderwall
msg:1379907 | 8:49 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| The average per publisher - assuming circa 20,000 publishers - is $18,885 per year |
|
Surely going by the cheque numbers issued the figure must be nearer 44,000? |
|
What about when Google reprints cheques for publishers?
|
OptiRex
msg:1379908 | 8:58 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| What about when Google reprints cheques for publishers? |
|
Surely that don't make that many errors? I'm not saying they don't reprint however I don't personally know of anyone who has received one. Do you have any numbers on this?
|
oddsod
msg:1379909 | 8:06 am on Apr 1, 2005 (gmt 0) |
| The difference between my January and February 2005 cheque |
|
There have been several discussions during last year comparing cheque numbers. That's what I went by. Besides, some of you may have missed the qualifier to the "per publisher" comment: This figure has no value whatsoever :)
|
|
