homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.161.192.130
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & jatar k & martinibuster

Google AdSense Forum

    
160 wide skyscraper
is it better than the 120 thin skyscraper?
dibbern2

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 6:07 am on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

I am experiencing a decrease in CTR and sorting thru the possible causes (besides just normal AS flucuations).

One recent modification was replacing the "old" 120x600 skyscraper block with the wider 160 px wider version. Has anyone experienced a change -either positive or negative- by making the same change?

I'm guessing that the wider version will be more effective, but it appears to have the opposite effect.

Thanks in advance.

 

ProTalker

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 8:48 am on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

It will vary from site to site, and page to page. The only way to find out is to take identically-designed pages on your site, set up one type of ad on some of the pages and the other type on the rest, give them separate channels, and watch.

europeforvisitors



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 11:18 am on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

Unless I'm mistaken, Google claims that the 160 x 600 skyscraper is its most effective ad size.

Why not test by switching back to the skinny skyscraper to see what happens?

bts111

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 12:19 pm on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

I agree with EFV, Google does rec. the 160x600. Just give it a go and see what happens.

DamonHD

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 2:11 pm on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

Hi,

For me, 160 wide is *generally* the most effective, especially on the left. But ad blindness can set in in any format.

Rgds

Damon

hunderdown

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 3:09 pm on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

I recently switched a number of pages from 120 to 160, and CTR increased significantly...

dibbern2

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 7:32 pm on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the advice. As usual, this forum's people are the best.

jimh009

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 11849 posted 8:36 pm on Feb 1, 2006 (gmt 0)

I had a positive increase in CTR by switching to the 160x600 from the 120x600. It's larger, easier to read and you get one more "ad choice" for the user to click on (5 ads displayed instead of 4).

That said, that size ad also blends in much better with my site, where-as the 120 wide ad sort of disappeared into the navigation area (my left navigation area is 200 pixels wide).

So look at your site structure first and foremost. If the ad looks good to you, it will likely increase CTR. If not, stick with the smaller ad is it is working for you.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Google / Google AdSense
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved