| This 37 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 37 ( 1  ) || |
|Google vs eBay as Competitors|
| 5:19 pm on Jun 17, 2003 (gmt 0)|
This seems not to be very accurate about Google.
| 7:47 am on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)|
This thread has gained some steam hasnt it!? Some heated discussion too.
Some points I have gained from reading this that I hadn't really thought about previously:
 If someone has a negative experience on e-bay then it directly effects the users' perspective of e-bay.
 If someone has a negative experience through a site they found using google, then 99.9% of the time it will not reflect badly on google
 If someone has a positive experience through E Bay the user will be more inclinded to use E-Bay as a source to find further items in the future
 If someone has a positive experience through a site found using Google, they are more inclined to visit that site directly next time, and not go via google. An interesting anomoly
Nice post this one. Thanks
| 8:43 am on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Nice summary sticky! :)
Like 1milehigh says, to a certain extent Google and Ebay are in the same business (putting customers in touch with businesses), could their relationship be like that of file sharing networks (peer 2 peer vs company hosted).
If I recall correctly, the file sharing networks that actually hosted the files (ie took on the responsibility of them) faced a tough legal time.
The ones that let users share files stored on their own PCs, however, were able (so far) to stay in a grey area - difussion of responsibility - let the users take the risk.
Could Ebay face legal issues in the future that Google will be able to avoid - ie, fraud being committed via their site?
In the UK, pub landlords face fines if customers are caught dealing drugs on the premises. Some websites have also faced closure and penalties due to the content they host.
Could we see a crackdown on services offered by sites as well and perhaps a requirement to regulate it?
Not entirely an unrealistic possiblitly, especially given the scope of large sites.
That's where Ebay would most likely lose out to Google - they have a responsibility to their users, Google do not.
| 11:35 am on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Most ebayers I know understand that e-bay is just the middleman. If they have a bad experience there more likely to blame themselves.
1milehgh80210, Feeback can be faked, and sellers have many, many accounts.
I think the PayPal integration is a big plus over Google, for merchants who may not be able to trade online otherwise, Its an instant shop ..I mean auction :) For customer aquisition I cant fault it.
I used to detest PayPal, username/password etc, for single one/off purchases its terrible but for Ebay its just perfect.
| 1:32 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)|
A perspective from both sides:
Sold on eBay for 2 1/2 years and was also a buyer. Run an ecommerce website.
When people have bad experiences on eBay, they do tend to associate those experiences with eBay. Not because they don't realize that there is differentiation between sellers, but because eBay is a marketplace. Much in the same way that if I go to one of those food markets where there are many smaller vendors, if I have a few bad experiences with vendors, pretty soon, I don't like that market anymore.
You tend to place a certain level of accountability on the marketplace, whereas you know a search engine is just a search engine.
While eBay does offer some buyer protection programs, such as square trade and their insurance, and the feedback forum, having been through the experience twice (both with high feedback sellers with no negatives or 99.98% positives) I can say that it really doesn't work out as well as a consumer would like. PayPal's buyer protection policy only covers delivery of merchandise, not condition nor misrepresentation. If you use a credit card company's chargeback protection with PayPal, BOOM, account restricted. eBay requires you to wait 30 days post transaction to start the fraud complain process, which, when the clock is ticking, could leave you with even fewer options should they not decide in your favor. After enough experiences with these systems, I prefer to buy from a normal ecommerce website where at least I KNOW I have the credit card issuer's protection.
|but I guarantee you that any small business not peddling their wares on Ebay too is missing out on a nice source of profit. |
It all depends on what you sell. For many retailers selling new products, they often have controls in pricing, distribution or imposed by the manufacturer that would prevent them from selling on eBay. It's all about what you sell. I think each has it's place. But it depends on the product and the company selling the product. There are always different "channels" for merchandise. And, I'm one of those people that views eBay (from the merchant's perspective) as advertising, nothing more, nothing less. And a merchant would be wise to consider all the available advertising channels and use them appropriately.
| 3:17 am on Jun 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
As far as reputation goes, a company's overall reputation is based on a sort of average of many people's perspectives. Thus, while there maybe a general consensus as to the reputation of a particular brand, depending on who you ask, you'll get a different response, therefore the debate is endless because there is no correct answer. Tying this into the google vs ebay discussion, I would argue that ebay is a culture, with a sort of cult following. Among this group of people (which is extremely large these days), ebay is an extremely reputable company, in which people feel safe buying and selling all day long. But no matter how reputable ebay may actually be, this still does not negate the fact that to many non-ebay users, there still exists a large hesitation to use ebay. Whether this is warranted or not is irrelevant, many people still are leary of using ebay.
On another note, I refuse to believe that eBay and Google are such competitors as the article makes it out to be. I think a partnership, as a previous poster said, makes a lot more sense. The average consumer, when looking to buy a product, will use a search engine to either find an online merchant, or a merchant in their area. They will probably only go to eBay if searching for a special bargainm, an outdated or rare product. The key word there being average consumer, because a regular eBay user clearly will use eBay.
....hope my rambling made some sense...
| 10:39 pm on Jun 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I'd say googles rep depends on being able to find what you want. And e-bays rep depends on being satisfied once you find what you want.
Ebay is even more dominant in their niche than google in theirs and I expect them to stay there.
| 3:37 am on Jul 1, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I think GG & eBay are both useful for us!
| This 37 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 37 ( 1  ) |