| 9:11 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
OH BOY! An online word processor! That will really help me in my neverending search for other people's documents...!?
What the hooey does word processing have to do with search? I'll tell you... not a dang thing. Just another chunk of screen real estate to plaster advertising all over.
What the heck happened to Google?
| 9:15 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
>> What the hooey does word processing have to do with search? I'll tell you... not a dang thing. Just another chunk of screen real estate to plaster advertising all over.
how about "don't use MS Word, but use our online service, where you can save, and access it from anywhere." This is very important to the future...
| 9:23 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
So, how many "Beta" web apps have been bought up by G, Y!, and MS? It's nice that one doesn't need to finish even the first version of something anymore. ;)
| 9:23 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
>>"don't use MS Word, but use our online service, where you can save, and access it from anywhere."<<
I hear what you're saying, but what has that got to do with search?
There are already a dozen online storage dumps that are free, this one will be no different. And regardless it still has nothing to do with search.
I can't help but be disappointed with Google. They are every bit the monopoly that MS is, yet the funny name seems to engender some weird cult mentality.
| 9:28 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
"Document management" anyone?
"Knowledge extraction" anyone?
Perhaps a bit more than meets your eye.
Anyone know of any patents or patents pending? They're always interesting.
| 9:32 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Who ever said Google was only focused on search?
| 9:39 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Never settle for the best
"The perfect search engine," says Google co-founder Larry Page, "would understand exactly what you mean and give back exactly what you want." Given the state of search technology today, that's a far-reaching vision requiring research, development and innovation to realize. Google is committed to blazing that trail. Though acknowledged as the world's leading search technology company, Google's goal is to provide a much higher level of service to all those who seek information, whether they're at a desk in Boston, driving through Bonn, or strolling in Bangkok.
To that end, Google has persistently pursued innovation and pushed the limits of existing technology to provide a fast, accurate and easy-to-use search service that can be accessed from anywhere. To fully understand Google, it's helpful to understand all the ways in which the company has helped to redefine how individuals, businesses and technologists view the Internet.<<
| 9:44 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
No Wait. It gets better. RMOTFL (Same URL as above):
>>Top Ten things Google has found to be true
1. Focus on the user and all else will follow.
From its inception, Google has focused on providing the best user experience possible. While many companies claim to put their customers first, few are able to resist the temptation to make small sacrifices to increase shareholder value. Google has steadfastly refused to make any change that does not offer a benefit to the users who come to the site:
o The interface is clear and simple.
o Pages load instantly.
o Placement in search results is never sold to anyone.
o Advertising on the site must offer relevant content and not be a distraction.
By always placing the interests of the user first, Google has built the most loyal audience on the web. And that growth has come not through TV ad campaigns, but through word of mouth from one satisfied user to another.<<
| 9:51 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I don't understand all the animosity. If you don't like it, don't use it. It's not very complicated.
| 9:57 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
>>What the hooey does word processing have to do with search?
Example: Word97 documents, when saved as HTML, had pretty clean code and could be used as is to put up web pages. Still have some recipes on line on my first personal homepage done that way, and they're fine..
Scenario: Someone is on vacation visiting with relatives, no personal laptop. But OP's computer can be used. So using online mail service and/or a printer, correspondence can be done, as well as updating websites when necessary.
The web stuff is related to search, keeping sites up to date and "fresh." That's just off the top of my head.
| 9:58 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Please don't confuse the expression of animosity with the exposure of hypocrisy.
I don't mean to come across as antagonistic. I just have a hard time wrapping my head around the double standard of:
Google+Monopoly=what's the big deal?
| 10:03 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
It won't be long before MS has a "me-too" offering...
| 10:14 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
It's only natural that a company will want to gain as much presence as possible. As some have said before, Google may be working to indirectly helping its search revenues by hitting Microsoft where it will hurt most, its office suite (and presumably the OS at some point).
| 10:22 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Microsoft+Monopoly=Lets charge people their socks off for our software on an annual basis. Break their bank, then make them dependant on our buggy software
Google+Monopoly=Sacrifice a little surfing privacy for a service that is free, gives you what you want(more likely if you use the tool correctly) and is free!
I dont want ot see google expanding too quickly into other markets(which it seems it has) but i pray to god they become a player in the software industry.
Some have speculated that they will buy sun systems. If they do so, with the talent in their ranks, and do it good then i will gladly have another reason to abandon MS.
With the capital they now have they can look to other markets whilst still improving search. They just need to find the balance.
Anolonda, they may be a monopoly in search and may be looking to get in bed with other players, but lets just give them some more time before we judge. I have my GoogleGlasses on, hope you are not blinded by the glare...
| 10:35 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Google controls 48% of the search market; MS, 95% of the desktop.
Which one is the monopoly?
| 10:37 pm on Mar 9, 2006 (gmt 0)|
"It won't be long before MS has a "me-too" offering... "
It already exists....
| 12:50 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I'm surprised that the GBrowser isn't here yet.
| 1:30 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|I'm surprised that the GBrowser isn't here yet. |
Don't be. They are patiently waiting for MS to lose a bit more market share. Once that happens, along comes Google to the rescue and in one big swoop takes a big chunk of market share. Tie in the GBrowser with their purchase of dark fiber networks, mapping of major cities, the buying of any company that does anything remotely technological. Google is getting prepared for Planet Google. Mark my words. And you thought MS had a monopoly? Snicker, snicker, snicker.
What's the future look like? Oh, let's see...
The list goes on and on. Google is like this giant octopus right now and it has its tenacles dangling about all over the place. Once it finishes "suckling" everyone, it will retract its tenacles and we'll all be locked in its grips forever. ;)
| 1:49 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Thats it, tonight i'm registering,
Just kidding, but I wonder how long it will take to register these names since they are currently unregistered? :)
| 1:52 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Many companies have made the mistake of underestimating Microsoft's capabilities. It's the company people love to hate.
They've got a huge advantage when it comes to competing with Google - they are the underdog.
Acquiring Writely is a good example of how Microsoft and Google are taking a different approach to the market. Businesses would never think of having their employees use tools where advertisements are commonly shown. For the average surfer away from the office, something like Writely with ads is perfect.
| 2:29 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
My 2 Bits:
A way more convenient service that some here are giving credit, even for businesses (especially small businesses without a VPN), and inter business collaborations.
My introduction to writely was a few months back when me and three other people, who've never met, had to work together to crack out a mission statement for a collab project. Writely ended up being the perfect tool for that. One central place where all 4 of us could log into, see the changes the others had made, and put in our own changes, without having to co-ordinate schedules.
If you've ever had to do something of this nature, you'll understand how powerful and usefull a tool this is.
Google buying Writely:
I resisted that GMail invite for months - even though I first got it when people were selling them on eBay for over $100.
Eventually I succumbed because of the underlying usefullness of the product.
I'm not gonna rage against the machine on this one. I'm getting bored of raging against the machine.
In fact, I think I've been reduced to pop-culture reference sarcasm.
We are the Google. Resistance is futile. Your data WILL be assimilated.
| 3:58 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
"It won't be long before MS has a "me-too" offering... "
Its funny how people think everything Google does is "revolutionary" and "newsworthy". Microsoft was the first one who came up with OfficeLive and Google is the one who is coming up with "me-too" offering. Another example of Google offering "me-too" is AdWords offering demographic targetting.
It will be really sad when people actually use GDrive and Writely and make their private information, not so private. All because it will be free.
I am really surprised that Origami didn't even make it to the front page of this forum. Biased, are we?
| 4:52 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
>> Microsoft was the first one who came up with OfficeLive and Google is the one who is coming up with "me-too" offering.
Actually, MS doesn't have a web word processor but they are no doubt feverishly working on one now. Office and OS revenue is MS's bread and butter so a web word processor is significant.
MS marketing surrounding Office Live is suffiently good that people actually believe there is a word processor when there is none. MS is good at shaping perception.
Google wants to move applications and storage off of the desktop.
MS needs to create an offering that is nearly as good, embrace and extend it, defeat the competition, let it languish then lead users back to the desktop probably through some form integration.
| 5:04 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
On page [www2.writely.com...]
|Will you start showing Google ads in my documents? |
There are currently no plans to add advertising to the site. If that changes, we'll let folks know.
So Google is expanding adserving network.
| 5:50 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I think it is a good idea. I get tired of uploading MS Word documents to my email account so I can work on them when I am away from my computer. I will probably sign up for a service like this in the near future.
| 9:19 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|I hear what you're saying, but what has that got to do with search? |
When you have 1000 Writely documents saved onto your GDrive, the best way to find the one you're looking for them will be to search for it...
A great way to expand your search business is to create new arenas for it yourself.
| 11:27 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|We are the Google. Resistance is futile. Your data WILL be assimilated. |
IMO this is best definition of Google approach and funny thing is that I don't have almost anything against it until Larry and Sergey are in charge... but what will happened later?
| 11:35 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I don't agree about what is being said about double standards etc. Reasoning that google is good and microsoft is bad is perfectly fine.
Forget about the names the brands and the usefullness/annoyences of their products.
1 monopolist == bad
while there is a monopolist the emergence of a second monopolist == good
potential struggle between the two == very very good :)
| 11:52 am on Mar 10, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Did they buy it just because it follows the G convention "beta"? :)
| This 38 message thread spans 2 pages: 38 (  2 ) > > |