| 7:06 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
There are two schools of thought out there, the first says this:
PCs will be so powerful, they will understand your search habits and gather information from the 'net day and night storing it on your cheap terabyte hard drive and organizing it to your liking, even pushing information to you.
Days of the powerful PC are numbered, information will be organized in central locations where it will be accessed by terminal-like machines.
This is the great client / server question. With Google's vision of organizing information, they don't have a need for powerful computers at each home.
I can believe they might introduce thin client like machines that offer the basics of internet access and multimedia via streaming online services.
| 7:30 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
> It's worth mentioning this article is followed by
> other huge rumors like MS buying out Yahoo for $90B
Look around the net. That was a major rumor two weeks ago that MS was trying to work a deal with Yahoo after they got jilted from AOL. So much so, I think there was some credibility to it.
> Days of the powerful PC are numbered, information
> will be organized in central locations where it
> will be accessed by terminal-like machines.
My Cobol teacher said nearly the same thing (in 1982).
It sounds alot like what they said about fighter jets being obsolete about the time of the Vietnam war.
It sounds alot like what they said about cars being obsolete in the face of mass transit systems.
> Web as platform?
Over blown hype by programmers looking for work in the face of cheap PC software and those sucked in to the "we'll buy anything NOT microsoft" era.
| 7:41 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Just a thought. As google play the Brand Name game on the front of a PC now without arch rivals software on it does Walmart stock Windows?
The reason for me asking is basically because I cant see Mr Joe Public buying one without the other. No right minded person that is not an enthusiast would.
No offence ment to all of the Linux and Unix bods out there.
| 7:43 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
wall street likes it:
| 8:23 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Yup, they sure do.
| 9:48 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
An analyst raised Google's price target to $600/share this morning which has a lot to do with today's $20 gain.
| 9:52 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
I don't understand what all the fuss is.
It sounds to me like they are going to be making cheap computers, at a near loss.
What good are all of these low-end computers if Google doesn't retain their search engine, and/or Advertising dominance? Sounds like they are still leaning heavily on AdWords/AdSense to make money...
I don't think that any large companies would impliment the "Google" computer either. For privacy reasons primarily... and the fact that 99% of the end users out there don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
If YPN, or MSN, or any other company for that matter - takes market share away from Google, they could end up with a lot of "empty" or less targeted ad space out there. It's bound to happen sooner or later.
| 10:20 pm on Jan 3, 2006 (gmt 0)|
| This 38 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 38 ( 1  ) |