skippy
msg:1234961 | 6:57 pm on May 27, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Unbelievable is right!
|
digitalv
msg:1234962 | 6:59 pm on May 27, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I wonder if Google sponsored the study :P I wouldn't believe a word of it - I remember hearing similar quotes about etoys.com and other now bankrupt companies during the dotcom boom back in the day. On another note isn't it amusing how this is the only industry where 1998 is "back in the day"? Heh.
|
Marcia
msg:1234963 | 5:52 pm on Jun 22, 2004 (gmt 0) |
They just released new guidelines, there's a minimum buy of 5 shares. 'Spensive at $849 per!
|
blaze
msg:1234964 | 8:59 am on Jun 23, 2004 (gmt 0) |
The page you requested cannot be found.
|
|
Methinks typo.
|
EquityMind
msg:1234965 | 2:02 pm on Jun 23, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Hmm...it was working when I originally posted it...they mustve archived it.
|
HitProf
msg:1234966 | 3:13 pm on Jun 24, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| * In May, Shapiro found that respondents were willing to invest a total of $840 on average for Google shares. That question was not repeated in June. |
|
Uhm... total average spend on shares, not PER share ;)
|
johntang
msg:1234967 | 8:25 am on Jul 16, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Pay attention to your thoughts! Any case research lacks personal commitment!
|
skibum
msg:1234968 | 4:44 am on Jul 24, 2004 (gmt 0) |
With Amazon, Ebay, and Yahoo! stocks all falling like rocks, [even after some good earnings reports] is there a chance the Google IPO could be a dud? Seems like if most others in the sector are stumbling while arguably performing pretty well, enthusiasm for Google stock may be dampened a bit, especially if nobody understands how the IPO works.
|
digitalv
msg:1234969 | 5:40 am on Jul 24, 2004 (gmt 0) |
...nevermind
|
|
