homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.66.204
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Pay Per Click Engines
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Pay Per Click Engines Forum

    
Sprinks Content Advertising signs MSNBC.com
heini




msg:1231284
 10:18 am on Jul 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

CBS Marketwatch [cbs.marketwatch.com] reports Sprinks has signed with MSNBC, running 9 months.

Sprinks Content ads will appear on MSNBC, although MSN has rather tight relations with Overture.

 

jeremy goodrich




msg:1231285
 6:07 pm on Jul 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

Perhaps Microsoft (who just renewed with Overture) wants to make sure that there is enough competition among the various providers to keep people guessing?

Though Sprinks has been running their content targeted program for longer, perhaps Microsoft wants to have a benchmark also to be able to guage the effectiveness of one partner compared to another?

heini




msg:1231286
 4:29 pm on Jul 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

Actually the article is well worth a read. With the current frenzy about Content targeted ads it might be good to take a look at things from the perspective of Sprinks, who have first hand experience with this form of avertizing.
Sprinks' Podell expects about $50 million to $80 million in revenue for the entire industry. ... The click- through rates for content-targeted advertising is half a percentage point, said Podell. The average price per click for a term is roughly 57 cents, he said.

Sprinks_Rep




msg:1231287
 5:35 pm on Jul 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi, I'm a member of the Sprinks Marketing team and I would be more than happy to help out with any questions you may have about our ContentSprinks program.

And yes, as you know, Sprinks has been perfecting PPC contextual ads for the past three years. We began listing topical listings on About.com and within the past year have developed relationships with AOL Web Properties, CBS MarketWatch, Forbes.com and now MSNBC.com.

Unlike Overture and Google, we allow advertisers to buy actual topics. These topics are then mapped to specific relevant editorial pages on our partners' sites.

Winooski




msg:1231288
 12:28 am on Jul 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi Sprinks_Rep, welcome to WebmasterWorld. (Brett, I assume Sprinks_Rep's authenticated?)

Re:

Unlike Overture and Google, we allow advertisers to buy actual topics. These topics are then mapped to specific relevant editorial pages on our partners' sites.

Does Sprinks need a human being to categorize partners' sites, or is it done "automagically"? (Or both?)

europeforvisitors




msg:1231289
 2:52 am on Jul 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

Unlike Overture and Google, we allow advertisers to buy actual topics. These topics are then mapped to specific relevant editorial pages on our partners' sites.

Like the "Apartments in Barcelona" Sprinks on About.com's Gofrance travel site?

Sprinks_Rep




msg:1231290
 12:14 pm on Jul 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

When we don't have a full house of ads for a specific topic, some of our publishers, like About.com, choose to pull in broader topics like "Travel" behind the ads in the actual category.

Sprinks_Rep




msg:1231291
 12:17 pm on Jul 9, 2003 (gmt 0)
Re: Winooski.

Yes, Sprinks manually maps our ContentSprinks topics to our partner's editorial pages. We have staff dedicated to each of our partners. By working with our partners diligently before we actually roll Sprinks listings out onto their pages, we can achieve the type of contextual targeting advertisers (and partners) are looking for.

beck91601




msg:1231292
 4:42 pm on Jul 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Sprinks rep,

Has your company ever done anything about the fraud problem. I was never able to get customer service even though I was a good spender. If they have implemented and kind of fraud protection I can always use more traffic.

Sprinks_Rep




msg:1231293
 5:19 pm on Jul 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi beck91601,

We have a significant anti-fraud program in effect that combines system side protection as well as continuous monitoring of our partners traffic. Due to advertiser concern, we have recently beefed up our efforts and have been receiving positive on our keyword traffic of late.

As for your own account, did you send your fraud complaint to abuse@sprinks.com? If that didn't work, email me and I'll have someone investigate your problem asap.

markus007




msg:1231294
 3:11 am on Jul 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

what are the requirements on becoming a partner site? From the info on the site it sounds like i need a million page views a day?

Sprinks_Rep




msg:1231295
 1:50 pm on Jul 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hello Markus007,

We don't have a set pageview minimum, but a property will need at least several million PAGEVIEWS of high quality editorial content pages to be considered a potential partner for our ContentSprinks program.

Net_Wizard




msg:1231296
 3:50 am on Jul 28, 2003 (gmt 0)

Yeah right :(

Needless to say I'm one of those unhappy ex-sprinks partner. All you Sprinks/About really care is click-through. I offered a proper ethical solution at that time and you Sprinks/About did was pass me around to different reps. I have to email the VP at that time but by then it was gd too late, you guys dump me preferring instead a junk site that was just happy to provide you with garbage traffic.

In fact this so called Sprink/About partner is advertising on another PPC targetting low bids keywords and turn around those visitors(from the other PPC) and feed them the high paying keywords of Sprinks/About and you call that...

-----------------
high quality editorial content pages....?
-----------------

Where's that junk site now?

But, I'm glad that our partnership was dissolved though we didn't go through the whole term, it was actually a blessing in disguise.

BTW, after that messy affair, your VP at that time upon realizing that your company have dumped a valuable property, tried to win us back with promises of XML feed and better relation.

That's all you guys are good for....promises

------------------
My advice to people looking to advertise with Sprink. Don't take my word about how I feel about them because that was a long time ago when they were offering partnership with content sites.

But do search about Sprinks PPC and read what others have to say about them.

Hopefully, they have changed their ways, as for me, I'll never have a dealing, 'ever', with them again.
------------------

Just giving a balance view to what Sprinks_Rep seems to spin about which I understand he/she is just doing his/her job.

europeforvisitors




msg:1231297
 4:40 pm on Jul 28, 2003 (gmt 0)

That's all you guys are good for....promises

Does anyone here remember the Luna Network, a predecessor to Sprinks that also was owned by About.com? I was offered a Luna partnership with a "guaranteed sellout" of ad space and a $500 signing bonus. I signed the contract and mailed it in. Instead of getting a countersigned contract and a check, I then received a new contract with lousier terms and no signing bonus. I was also asked to send a letter to MediaMetrix authorizing them to include my independent site's traffic in About.com's. (And no, I didn't sign the new contract--I just turned my back on the Luna Network.)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Pay Per Click Engines
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved