| 2:56 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|Google, which boasts more than 100,000 advertisers world-wide |
Maybe I've been sleeping. I didn't realize that Google had already passed Overture in number of advertisers. Wow.
| 6:40 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)|
That's the first time that number has been released, as far as I know.
| 6:49 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)|
any estimates for the average yearly ad spending per advertiser?
maybe some overture data?
| 5:23 pm on Mar 8, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Umm, not sure about those numbers. The only one I know for sure is 100K advertisers on Google, which coincides nicely with the 100K posts on the Google News forum. :)
The momentum that AdWords has is pretty amazing. English + 10 non-English languages, geographic targeting, options for content ads--it's exciting to watch.
| 5:30 pm on Mar 8, 2003 (gmt 0)|
in this instance I would assume that the number of 1time Adwords advertisers will be getting counted.
naturally with the low entry expense, many a webmaster has gone and opened an account, and then never used it to its real potential.
Overture on the other hand has a slightly higher entry cost, combined with a few more headaches getting campaigns live.
Although I have NO data (sorry GG, your girls in the UK wont share that sort of sensitive information with me, even when I told them it was to help you), I reckon quite a number will be -$1,000 per year.
| 6:51 am on Mar 9, 2003 (gmt 0)|
haha - nice try vitaplease... slightly less obvious than asking for a revenue sheet straight up, i mean, you still would have to multiply...