mack
msg:271511 | 10:16 am on Jan 13, 2006 (gmt 0) |
I would probably carry out a search using that KW and see what topic the top ranking sites are using. This will give you an idea what content to aquire/write. Mack.
|
tedster
msg:271512 | 6:46 pm on Jan 13, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Divining intention is one of the big jobs that search engines wrestle with. For example, on certain ambiguous keywords Google is now using a "split" results page. It takes a lot of data-mining to get this kind of information indirectly. A user feedback form might be helpful. If you have a site search, there can be gold in monitoring those "no click" searchers or the ones who need to reformulate their query immediately.
|
myrrh
msg:271513 | 12:52 am on Jan 14, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| If you have a site search, there can be gold in monitoring those "no click" searchers or the ones who need to reformulate their query immediately. |
|
Please say more about that. What is a "no click" searcher and how would one monitor them? And how is a "no click" searcher different from ones who need to reformulate their query? Thanks for your time.
|
tedster
msg:271514 | 3:01 am on Jan 14, 2006 (gmt 0) |
By a no-click searcher I mean somone who doesn't click on a result and they don't refornulate the query either -- they just go elsewhere. Combine some kind of server-side click-tracking for the results page with regular log analysis and you can reveal the patterns.
|
|
