| 12:47 pm on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Nope, it's not considered spamming. Keep it the way it is. Nice way to get traffic, huh? ;-)
| 2:35 pm on Oct 28, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for the reply.
How many times should a keyword phrase appear on a page? is there a lower and upper limit? 10 times? 25?
| 5:02 pm on Nov 3, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Don't abuse keywords in page and analyze keyword density of good competitors. If you go for 25 you will spam and won't work.
BTW misspelling, in theory, seems to drive traffic but it looks very ugly...
I'm still experimenting with that.
Does anybody have good results misspelling?
| 4:34 am on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Works AMAZINGLY well - I have seen different types of implementations
as easy as listing out on the site
other spellings include:
. . . .
| 10:47 am on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Misspellings can be very useful, whether deliberate or inadvertent! When I'm deliberately misspelling a word, I usually say something like "... widgets, and not wigdets as it's commonly misspelt"
An inadvertent error in an article I posted last week has already had more than 300 searches for that misspelling!
| 3:46 pm on Nov 7, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Thanks! Very usefull posts.