homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Gold Sponsor 2015!
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Keyword Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Keyword Discussion Forum

Wordtracker "count" figures
just doesn't look right

5+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 8:25 pm on May 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Ok, in WordTracker, I have done some searches for broad popular keywords. I will use "email" and cellphone" as examples.
The "count" figures returned are:
email 5,332
cellphone 540

the count column is described as the # of times the keyword has been searched for in the last 60 days. These numbers look very, very low to me. I know that I must be mis-understandign SOMETHING. Any help would be appreciated.



WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 5:47 pm on May 23, 2005 (gmt 0)


You aren't missing nothing.Word Tracker, as well as all the other keyword tools is often unreliable. Try other methods to pick the best keywords...


WebmasterWorld Senior Member caveman us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 4:45 pm on May 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

bonniebrook, actually, you are missing something:

email: 5322
cellphone: 540
cell phone: 3667



10+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 1:48 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

Pm me if you want to use a tool that i found two months ago. it's free and looks to be more acurate than ones I've seen.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 5:15 am on May 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

I was noticing the same as caveman - cell phone is actually two words. However, I wouldn't depend on any of the keyword tools for accuracy. However, what I have found #*$! to be useful for is knowing if the singular or a plural version on a term is more popular.


10+ Year Member

Msg#: 1279 posted 12:11 am on Jun 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

You also have to realize WordTracker only 'counts' Dogpile results. In fact, according to the WT documentation they have full access to the Dogpile weblogs, thus it IS accurate...for Dogpile. Whether or not Dogpile is representative of other engines is open to debate.

For example, MSN has more older women using its service, and as the stock homepage to every IE user on the planet the majority of MSN searchers are probably users who never bother to change it (i.e. novice users).

Dogpile is a niche metacrawler engine and most of its users are probably more advanced, and thus not looking for 'email' and 'cell phone'. 'linux' returns 4832 hits on WordTracker, and I highly doubt more people care about linux than cell phones in the overall internet world.

So part of our research should be on the use of engines and not just numbers of searches (which, theoretically, could change dramatically overnight anyway). MSN is more of the layman engine, Google is a little more techie, and Yahoo is in the middle of the two. Engines like Vivisimo likely have a very techie/advanced userbase.


Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Keyword Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved