homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.28.193
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Keyword Discussion
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Keyword Discussion Forum

    
Keyword density & word variations
Google sees widget, widgets etc. as being the same on some terms?
lazycat




msg:272503
 9:07 pm on Oct 4, 2004 (gmt 0)

I thought my keyword density was fine until the last few weeks I noticed one page crash out of the index. On some searches it simply does not show up, on others, it is ranked very lowly even when including the name of my own site into the search terms!

I figured I'd leave it alone and see what happened but nothing changed...so, I have a question about keyword density and word variations.

Lets say I have a keyword "widget".

I do a search for widget or keyword + widget etc.

Google displays results and highlights in bold these terms from page titles and snippets:

widget, widgets, widgeting, widgeter, widgeters...

I have all those terms on my page.

For widget density is around 8%, for widgets 6%, for widgeter 6% etc.

Now, by themselves these densities are fine but put together they are going to be very high.

My question is, if google is highlighting all variations of the keyphrase when you do a search, is it safe to assume they are considering all those terms as being the same word/phrase on the page and thus whacking my keyword density sky high and causing my page to drop as drastically as it has? This page has gone from top five to complete obscurity for no other apparent reason.

Does anyone have experience or thoughts on this?

 

Collieman




msg:272504
 11:27 am on Oct 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

I have heard of the reverse happening. Where people have shown that successful sites have higher incidence of stemming.
So G is picking up stemming...and over stemming must therefore penalise?

Collieman




msg:272505
 11:33 am on Oct 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

I have heard of the reverse happening. Where people have shown that successful sites have higher incidence of stemming.
So G is picking up stemming...and over stemming must therefore penalise?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Keyword Discussion
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved