| 2:09 pm on Jul 15, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Do you mean the fact that AV-uk indexes quickly but AV com doesn't?
| 5:57 pm on Jul 15, 2000 (gmt 0)|
I mean this:
| 7:25 pm on Jul 15, 2000 (gmt 0)|
In the present company, I don't think I'll mention the old (converse) phrase that comes to mind.
| 8:44 am on Jul 16, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Have you seen this operating yet?
| 10:24 am on Jul 16, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Yes it popped up on me [at av.com] yesterday morning, haven't seen it since.
| 11:47 am on Jul 16, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Yes, I saw it yesterday too.
| 5:57 pm on Jul 16, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Hmmm, thanks NFFC and oldtimer, I think we knew it was coming, but I've not spotted it yet.
I tried about 20 separate searches on av.com, two separate dialups during today and spotted nothing yet. Perhaps they are still testing.
In some respects, I hope it works as positioning in av uk has been easier (for us uk-based sites) than av.com.
Keep watching the referred traffic to see is their is a boost from av.uk
| 7:11 pm on Jul 16, 2000 (gmt 0)|
You may have a cookie somewhere, try deleting them [if you really want to see it].
If this still doesn't work search for something with UK in the string and it should pop up when you next return.
| 6:57 am on Jul 17, 2000 (gmt 0)|
I submitted a .com site to AV.com the spider turned up.
Submitted a co.uk site to AV.com AV spider turned up immediately followed by /brillo - significant do you think?
| 6:58 am on Jul 17, 2000 (gmt 0)|
sorry - doubled up
Edited by: oldtimer
| 8:06 am on Jul 17, 2000 (gmt 0)|
NFFC - I'll try a new dialup with NS browser and see what I get.
oldtimer - i've been trying to fathom brillo and still not sure. I thought brillo might have been visiting to remove from the database for other reasons (spam removal).
From what you suggest, perhaps it is the "great uk shift"
| 10:59 am on Jul 17, 2000 (gmt 0)|
The co.uk site is still indexed on AV com but doesn't do well (does very well in AV-uk) so if Brillo is removing, it's only that page submittal (which is still indexed - but I can't be sure whether it was somewhere in the depths or not before resubmitting) Perhaps it's just removing a duplicate?