homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.215.146
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

    
Which is better: new stand-alone site or a directory in a portal site?
Should I turn down this job?
DeValle




msg:244143
 6:24 pm on Jul 29, 2005 (gmt 0)

I have a knotty problem here.

A client of ours sells large ticket items worth up to mid-six figures each (not real estate). A competitor's web site is getting higher SERPs than client's-- and client doesn't like it. Significantly, the client's complete web site is currently a folder that's living in a big portal type site, which I'll call widgetworld.com/myclient. Some of the client's pages are on www2.widgetworld.com. (I don't know the search engine significance of this, if any.)

Client doesn't have a stand-alone web site. But he wants one. He thinks that having a stand-alone site may help his searchability. Up to this point I've agreed and have encouraged the idea. But I'm no longer so sure.

He does have his own separate domain name but currently the domain myclient.com points to widgetworld.com/myclient.

My question is, my client searches fairly well from his HTML pages. But shouldn't he search better with a stand-alone web site? One that's under his own domain name-- vs. a few HTML pages and a database in a large portal type site? If so, how's the best way to do that without destroying what good searchability that the present pages have?

I would think that a stand-alone site could be effectively SEOd and SEMd in ways that one could not do when having to work within the restrictions of the templated pages on widgetworld.com.

The client's inventory of widgets is in a database on that directory site that's run on www2. That serves him well functionally. We could link seamlessly to it from any new site.

It may well turn out that we should leave things as they are because there are no work-arounds that would benefit the client. And fooling around with his current pages may lose what searchability that he does have.

Of course I'd love to sell the client a new web site and SEO and SEM. But if he's better off with my not tinkering, then I'll do the right thing and take a pass.

What's the concensus?

 

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved