mikec
msg:254009 | 10:34 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0) |
i dunno, i'm not too fond of the site search here. goto google and search "site:www.webmasterworld.com yoursearchhere"
|
chrisgarrett
msg:254010 | 11:24 am on Jan 17, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I usually take deep linking / deep pages to be highly specific pages about one topic with the "deep" aspect being depth away from the home page in terms of "clicks". Ie.
Widgets
- red widgets
- - french red widgets
- - - french red widgets with basil
- - - french red widgets with garlic
- - - french red widgets with mustard My "french red widgets with garlic" page is 4 deep from the widgets homepage
|
toma
msg:254011 | 12:45 am on Jan 26, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I will re-phrase my question. It is imho important and neglected part of SEO… I want no deep pages. I want all pages to have highest possible PR. There will be many of them.
Should I avoid organizing in folders, or should I avoid omitting linking them from home page (or both)?
to have my goal? Thanks for sharing your secrets :)
|
ken_b
msg:254012 | 1:05 am on Jan 26, 2005 (gmt 0) |
In my mind "Deep pages" refers more to the number of clicks needed to reach the destination page rather than to the folder structure. Linkwise (clicks), a deep page could just as well be in the root folder as buried 5 folders down. Conversely, a page 5 folders down could be just one click from the home page. I think counting the clicks is more important than counting the folders. But all of that has to be balanced with the user experience on the website.
|
|
