homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

.htm vs .html

 3:45 am on Jun 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

Silly simple question. My unleet searching skills came up with nothing.

In your proffessional opinions, does .html fair worse then .htm for the SERPs?

I'm just really old fashioned and insistant on .html with my stubborn ways. Thanks.



 4:34 am on Jun 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

.htm is a direct result of the old 8+3 character file naming restriction of MS DOS and some older operating systems. Search engines don't care whether you use .htm or .html, or even .php, so take your pick.



 8:59 pm on Jun 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

I've previously used .fred

Simply because I was bored and it allowed me to do a simple search for


to find out what pages were indexed. The added value that I didn't think of at the time was that it caused some viral interest in the page naming convention.


 2:27 am on Jun 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

there is a small body of anecdotal evidence that suggests google prefers the .htm extension, but I've seen no real evidence of this. .txt files seem to do really well, heh, php all the way for me baby!

I imagine, so long as the spider can parse the text data it GETs, it can be indexed. I've seen some wacky extensions do very well.


Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved