homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.24.103
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe to WebmasterWorld
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

    
SEO Paranoia question
Doing SEO alterations for a client that already ranks high...
switchWRX




msg:232541
 2:52 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

I am about to start a SEO project for a client that is already ranked very high (top 5) in most of the popular search engines. ie. google, alltheweb, yahoo. But they are somewhat lower (top 10) in others such as: MSN, askjeeves and altavista. They are wanting to improve their current ranking in both areas.

After a preliminary analyis of their setup I found the following that needed to be done:

remove splash page, add meta tag sections to other pages, tidy up urls, add non javascript nav, provice ALT tags, add a robot.txt.

My question is: Will any of those alterations/additions adjust their current ranking in a negative way?

discuss.

 

King of Bling




msg:232542
 3:32 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

I would surmise that those 'tweaks' could only help.

Be careful when changing file names for pages already indexed. Use a 301 redirect to point the SE to the new page.

Good luck

switchWRX




msg:232543
 3:55 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the 301 heads up bling!

Keep the comments coming.

Fruit and Veg




msg:232544
 4:07 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Those changes look good.

Instead of totally changing the JS nav, you could place all the JS code in the <head> onto an external file then also make sure every page has a few text links at the bottom for the spiders to follow.

You may find some existing rankings fluctuate, but as long as you clearly present the fact that the client is now gaining MORE traffic/sales/conversions from your work, then the fact that an old page was No.3 but is now No.23 shouldn't really matter, especially if you can demonstrate that the old page was ranking highly for a phrase that didn't actually generate any sales.

xbase234




msg:232545
 6:15 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Looks like you are using sound design principles. Just make sure you set the robots.txt file to "allow".

: )

switchWRX




msg:232546
 9:13 pm on Feb 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the input guys.

Should be a good contract, they offered a nice bonus package based on the ranking I get them.

cheers.

rfung




msg:232547
 1:22 am on Feb 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

of course - im curious if anyone has the experience of getting a SEO consultant making changes, and then having their site getting dropped out of the SERPs rankings out of those changes?

kmax




msg:232548
 1:45 am on Feb 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

Say... what is a 301 redirect?

Thanks
Kenny

seo_guy




msg:232549
 6:43 am on Feb 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

301 redirect tells the robots/spiders that the location of a page has permanently moved.

glengara




msg:232550
 7:43 am on Feb 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

I'd aim for W3C validation, keep the Alt text to describe images, use the Title attribute for links.

kmax




msg:232551
 2:35 pm on Feb 8, 2004 (gmt 0)

Ahhhhh I get it cool.
Thanks.

I see where someone suggested that he use a robots.txt.

I thought that was just a file you used if you did NOT want a dir spidered.

Maybe I have been messing up....

Do you always needs a robots.txt?

Thanks again
Kenny

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved