homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 107.21.163.227
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Website
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

    
Which content types are taboo for search engines?
Is .html that much better than .cgi, .php, or .shtml?
Laxters




msg:240432
 11:44 pm on Nov 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

Hi everyone,

Excellent site - I've been reading up through your posts and I've caught up a ton with search engine placement and ideas.

Here's my question: How well are dynamic pages being spidered and indexed these days?

I'm currently building out a new site. It's going to be low traffic, small content "brochure" site. I'd love to user .cgi or even .shtml to more easily add in some dynamic content or random images/colors.

So, does this hurt my search engine placement by doing so? Is it harder to crawl a site if the pages are .shtml or .cgi (with or without parameters)?

Thanks in advance,

-- Lax

 

troels nybo nielsen




msg:240433
 9:02 am on Nov 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

Welcome to WebmasterWorld, Laxters

My own experiences with dynamic pages are limited, but IMO it defintitely gives an advantage in search engines to keep your URL's as uncomplicated as possible.

Others may disagree, though.

Laxters




msg:240434
 10:45 pm on Nov 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Thanks for the info =)

Anyone else have other opinions/ideas/experiences? I guess I'm still wondering about which scripting languages get indexed best.

[edited by: Laxters at 11:15 pm (utc) on Nov. 17, 2003]

richlowe




msg:240435
 10:49 pm on Nov 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

My understanding is that any page name and type at all is fine. It's the parameters that make it difficult or impossible to crawl.

tomparis




msg:240436
 3:36 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

Some of my dynamic ASP pages were difficult for the search engine to index. I have both a lot of static pages for the robots to chew on.

SEs don't like to read asp code, or jsp either!

richlowe




msg:240437
 4:50 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

SEs don't like to read asp code, or jsp either

Untrue. There is no difference as far as the browser is concerned between ASP and HTML. ASP is done at the server.

Laxters




msg:240438
 5:02 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

So basically, SEs don't care what scripting language is used on a site, but they have a hard time following links with parameters.

Good to know. I'm leaning towards CGI at this point now.

Now, does anyone know if spiders have problems following off-web root links? What about following into the /cgi-bin?

moltar




msg:240439
 5:35 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

It doesn't matter. You can disguise any content type to look as html or shtml. One line in .htaccess will parse your html files as they are shtml or even cgi and vise-versa.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved