wasmith
msg:247583 | 4:48 am on Apr 11, 2002 (gmt 0) |
What is going to happen when clambake is number one for its targeted keyword?
|
Marshall
msg:247584 | 7:20 am on Apr 11, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Gotta love taxes.com's response that it was free speach and protected by the first amendment. Give me a break.
|
ericwinter
msg:247585 | 9:09 pm on Apr 12, 2002 (gmt 0) |
The ruling might generate more PR than the search results did. The company had nothing to lose (except a bunch of lawyers fees). Interesting, albeit questionable, technique.
|
wangdy
msg:247586 | 4:43 pm on Apr 15, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Interesting... I wonder if the use of gateway pages had anything to do with the ranking court order?
|
WebGuerrilla
msg:247587 | 6:32 pm on Apr 15, 2002 (gmt 0) |
You got to wonder who told J.K. Harris it would be a smart thing to go after taxes.com. They could of spent much less hiring someone to simply build them a new site that didn't use frames, and that did include page titles. Now, many more people will be out searching for his name, which will lead them right to all the articles about their recent troubles with the IRS.
|
Laisha
msg:247588 | 6:59 pm on Apr 15, 2002 (gmt 0) |
We should probably avoid using the name J.K. Harris here as well. :)
|
|
