homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.167.41.199
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: mademetop

General Search Engine Marketing Issues Forum

This 42 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 42 ( 1 [2]     
Is SEO evolving into full Project Management?
tedster




msg:245432
 8:32 pm on May 25, 2002 (gmt 0)

split from another thread [webmasterworld.com]:

paynt:
It takes a great project manager or developer and when folks ask where SEO is going I think that’s the direction we’re moving in. A well optimized site is a well planned and developed site.

I agree, and what a trip it is.

Rapidly vanishing are the days of bare-bones doorway pages, domain farms, keyword tags, keyword stuffed alt attributes and a host of other relatively basic tricks. There's not even any real hope of precise algo busting today - the most you can hope for is an approximate idea of how a search engine massages what their spider picks up.

But for those riding the wave, the more that search engines find ways around the simple tricks of yesterday, the more our skills have had to grow into every corner of web development.

The challenge is, we don't have that kind of industry recognition at this point. We suffer an image problem!

SEO is often seen as a marketing step that a company takes AFTER their site is created. How much more effective our work can be if we manage the project from the very start.

No more all graphics Home Pages where we need to find workarounds for the search engines. No more marketing copy devoid of any keyword substance. No more file names created in geek-speak code strings. No more site structures that bury key pages 8 directories down.

How can we get our message out there - Come To Us First!

 

fathom




msg:245462
 1:36 pm on May 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

Hi JFord, I think the ultimate goal (from our position) is to remain self employed or retain ownership of your services.

The ultimate goal for the client is the create return-on-investment and profit. Many companies like being small or medium size since needed overhead is relative to the size of your company.

I really don't know any companies that wouldn't except profit as a business goal, even single one man operation.

NFFC




msg:245463
 1:39 pm on May 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

>the ultimate goal

If you take it one step further the ultimate goal is to promote your own sites and not do any work for clients.

IanTurner




msg:245464
 1:47 pm on May 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

I agree with NFFC - it would be great not to have to worry about SEO on client sites.

AussieStu




msg:245465
 1:58 pm on May 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

Yeah right ... and when I was a teacher, we all used to pontificate about how smoothly we could run the schools if there were no students.

AussieStu




msg:245466
 2:13 pm on May 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

JFord said:
...if more companies started to worry about SEO at the beginning of projects instead of the end, a lot of folks here would be working for giant corporations and be extremely unhappy in their careers.

There may well be some truth in that. What we need to have happen at the same time is for coporations to embrace the concept of telecommuting. They are getting there but I'd sure like to see it happen faster. Then we'd still be working for big corporations (and that might still be a problem for some of us) but we'd be able to work from home.

fathom




msg:245467
 2:02 am on Jun 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

NFFC >the ultimate goal

But that wouldn't be any fun!

an untaken nick




msg:245468
 3:18 pm on Jun 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

My attitude to this is to look at the business plan. When dealing with a client the fundamentals of their business plan need to be understood, corrected and incorporated into their web presence.

This will include such areas as competitive analysis, SWOT, market position etc. These are all things that a SEO would look at before doing anything at all. The obvious solution is that an SEO is someone who can correctly translate a business into an on line environment to acheive a ROI.

Traffic for traffics sake is useless so it is the skill blend that you have that will take you where you want to go. The bottom line is advancing the client.

tedster




msg:245469
 7:39 am on Jun 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

...an SEO is someone who can correctly translate a business into an on line environment to acheive a ROI.

Very well said. SEO in a vacuum is possible, but why bother? I find myself deeper and deeper into partnership with my clients. In some cases businesses have even revised and sharpened their off-line marketing based on things we've done or discovered on the web.

In cases like this, SEO goes even FURTHER than project management -- into full-blown from-the-ground-up business consulting.

fathom




msg:245470
 4:05 pm on Jun 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

So I take it that through reasoning all the fact and preponding the evidence you have answer your original question? Is SEO evolving into full Project Management? No

AussieStu




msg:245471
 5:10 pm on Jun 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

SEO can be a big part of project management and it can be a big part of business strategy planning but it will never be the whole of either story.

Is that a statement of the obvious?

It seems so to me but then it seems to me that "full project management" implies the whole story.

NFFC




msg:245472
 5:23 pm on Jun 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

>into full-blown from-the-ground-up business consulting.

I agree but why do that for someone else?

I give a real life example:

New business, SEO fee £20,000, first years turnover £4,000,000 50% of which came directly from the www [the other half came from offline advertising at a cost of £240,000].

If you are good at "business consulting" there has to come a point where you stike out and attack the markets directly. The alternative is to continue to be underpaid for the services you offer. imho

cre8pc




msg:245473
 5:27 pm on Jun 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

The idea of combining PM with SEO isn't new exactly, but it's a twist of my own work experience as a UI/Usability Quality Assurance Engineer.

Briefly, I was hired by an international Internet company that designed, maintained and hosted hundreds and hundreds of websites as a web designer. My background included being a self-employed SEO professional with a good reputation. The company that hired me utilized my SEO background when it became obvious that all our designs were being scrutinized by me from an SEO angle and I was speaking up about it.

The company wisely moved me from design to their new Quality Assurance Dept. As an experiment, (we had no idea who else in the world was doing this) they called me their Usability/UI QA Eng, but my test plans and methodology included all things SEO. Any new application front end needed to meet search engine/directory standards, as did all new UI. I developed test plans for this on my own because I couldn't find anyone doing this in usability circles.

Thus began the mini-wars with Project Managers representing Business Managers who had no clue or care about being found in engines. They simply wanted websites that sold things. I spent incredible time proving why their plans wouldn't work.

My role, and that of a Human Factors expert that was later hired to help designers, saved the company somewhere around a half million dollars in less than 6 months in wasted money trying their stupid ideas.

I can attest to the fact that companies don't like being told that FLASH sites aren't engine/user friendly.

I can attest to the fact that companies WANT to outwit and SPAM search engines and are willing to pay gobs of money to do so and/or pay programmers to design an application that will trick engines.

I can attest to the fact that project managers aren't trained in the fields they're assigned to. I taught PM's SEO and my design co-workers taught PMs basic web design. This is necessary to communicate to everyone buying into a project. I also taught my fellow QA Engineers who did server performance testing.

I can attest to how much fun it is to time servers rendering complicated code and crashing. I've watched servers render sites and when the user clicks on the 3rd web page, it crashes the server and renders the entire site unusable. How likely is it an engine robot is going index that?

What's overlooked is Quality Assurance and the addition of SEO professionals to this field. Along with heuristic evaluations, "discount usability testing", tasks, testing, and software app testing from server to code and back again - every website that's built with a business objective of wanting to be found by people and selling products on the Internet must be tested for proper SEO.

This is what I do now as a consultant. For some companies I am called a project manager. In that role I do SEO/QA/UI/Usability and on my happiest days, I actually get to code pages and do a little design (which I miss doing.)

One QA company in my area knows me and I've proven to them (over the past 2 years) the need for combining PM/SEO and QA. In fact, every site designed for this company for their own use didn't get past me. The design houses hired to build the QA company's websites did a terrible job. One website was completely graphics. There was no text anywhere on the entire site. Not even text links. Even the content was images. You know it's scary when even a QA company needs an in-house PM/SEO/UI/Usabilty person to cover their own butt, let alone work on client sites.

Now they want me to train people to do what I do - which is good because I'm turning away new business on a daily basis. I have too much work and nobody to refer this work too!

My point in this is that you're all on the money. There's a gigantic need for SEO and always will be. It meshes well with Quality Assurance testing, usability, and design. A person with project management background, who has experience in SEO/UI/Usability/Web Dev is worth a lot of money in my opinion. We're worth investing in. Smart companies will.

Wish I had the time to develop a database of folks with the right combo to carry on this sort of work. Hopefully you guys can push this. It's badly needed.

I started a small forum on my site (Yahoo Groups). Hope to get it off Yahoo and into the real world. We talk about this stuff there. I would love to help promote this thread, share resources on promoting PM/SEO work, and help in any way I'm able to.

There's a definite need for people who are trained to see the ENTIRE picture - from the business owner's wish list to design to programmer's reality check - to end user - to search engine promotion, and who can document, test, communicate and ease tensions between the entire team. It's a huge endeavor. I've done it.

The trick is to bring the programmers lotsa bagels and donuts.

All the best,
Kim Krause

This 42 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 42 ( 1 [2]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / General Search Engine Marketing Issues
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved