When I used WYSIWYG editors in the past I found Frontpage was not so simple. Then I stumbled accross Namo WebEditor and found out just what it can do. That in my opinion is the most versatile and easy editor currently available!
As of now I code my hand because it offers more control.
hi sderenzi, I got a copy of an early version of namo on a mag. cover, tried it and bought the latest version - dont like their templates at all, but I find it easy to use. Does anyone else use this wysiwyg?
When you say "no" are you speaking for everyone - I dont understand your msg. Are you replying to mine? I ask myself. I cant justify the expense of DW at this moment, so your comment "use DW" doesnt help. In fact I'm not sure what you are on about at all? Do you have a problem with Namo?
Will Namo WebEditor be able to do some cool functions like HTML kit can? For example if I want to make one change to 100 pages I can do this with HTML kit, can I do this with Namo also? I have yet to figure out most fuctions with HTML kit it is very complicated.
Also if I already have a website and I want to create a new layout adding tables, to separate top, left and main areas can I overlay this table onto the existing information or do I have to start all over again and copy and paste the text? If Namo cannot do this which program can? If HTML kit can do it can someone explain how? I find html kit to be very difficult to understand. I just downloaded the trial version of Namo and it is much more user friendly but I am not sure it can do what I want.