Smartphone, Wireless, and Mobile Technologies Forum

If you want to go wired, though, you might be able to do what I did. My house is wired with Cat 3 6-wire telephone cord. I co-oped four wires of the telephone line to use for ethernet, leaving two for telephone. Cat 3 is substandard for ethernet (not enough twists per foot), but it works fine. The ethernet spec says that you need eight wires, but four of the wires are not used.

Some day I'll pull some Cat 5/Cat 6 into the rooms, but this scheme is working for me.

Can you elaborate on #2 please?

I chose G over B, because the cost was only about $40 difference between the 2, and G offers 5x the pipe. Was a no-brainer for me. I'm happy so far, hopefully it stays that way.

Watch the placement of cordless telephones. I've found that when talking on mine, it seems overpower the signal (when far away from the WAP) and the connection gets sketchy. Also, I have a wireless keyboard in my office and if I lay my wireless PDA right next to it, it causes strange behavior. Bottom line, separate dissimilar wireless devices.

Also, according to my research, there are only 2 companies that make the actual "radio" part of the wireless devices. Each manufacturer takes a "radio" and then makes the software / firewall / case, and most importantly, the antenna. A certain company that starts with a D- seems to have the best combination out there now.

There is software out there that will monitor your connection and tell you if another device connects to your WLAN. If unauth'd you can pull the plug on it and start with a new security strategy. You can find it for around $40.00 US.

Don't forget you can mix them. Set up your wired network and then put an access point in for your wireless.

When I was up in Iowa, where it was a good mile between me and the next wireless network

>decide between the wired and wireless network.

I tried and tried to go completely wireless around the office. I've spent about a thousand on routers and cards over the last two years.
I just finished ripping out the cards last week and going back to a full wired system.

> Is 802.11g a must,

Yes.
a) speed.
b) security.
c) future expansion.
d) better signal to noise ratio (if you are in the states make sure to get 5.8ghz cordless phones instead of those in the 2ghz band). Hawkgirl can't use her phone and the internet at the same time. The phone knocks her wireless offline ever time. Leaving in an apt complex where there are alot of 2mhz range phones means alot of head aches for her.

Don't mess with B any more.

> A Linksys router and D-Link cards.

Yes, but they don't always play nicely.

> interference/dropped signal with wireless?

Tons. Things you are in for going wireless.

Lots of reboots. If you drop wireless carrier, windows doesn't always ack that you have picked it back up. Instead, you end up doing alot of rebooting to solve problems.
If you turn on/off alot of equipment, half your network will often drop those.
Bascially, the only solution is to leave all machines on all the time.

Are you in a "noisy" area? Like an apt complex? I leave in a dense neighborhood. I am picking up 5 other wireless networks right now. I am to the point of almost giving up my interent connection and just using my neighbors - lol. All that noise can cause drops and reconnects.

Speed. You will certainly notice a difference in speed between a 10/100 hardwire and a wireless. There is a lag time to every click with wireless. It makes no difference if that wireless router is within inches of you machine - there is always overhead with any request. (noticeable overhead). Once it starts - it isn't too bad, but you will notice the lag.

Security - although it is a pain, don't skimp - go for it. I can browse some of my neighbors computers at will if I wanted.

> I co-oped four wires of the telephone line to use for ethernet,