homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.224.53.192
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Hardware and OS Related Technologies / Smartphone, Wireless, and Mobile Technologies
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: bakedjake

Smartphone, Wireless, and Mobile Technologies Forum

    
Diff between normal/mobile processor
amolanvekar

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 251 posted 10:34 am on Mar 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

Please can somebody specify as to what are the
differences between a normal Intel P4 processor or a
Mobile Intel P4 processor? I am about to buy a laptop
where the normal processor is been offered about a
100 pounds cheaper than the mobile processor.

So I would like to know what advantages I would be having
if I go in for the mobile processor; Also can you
specify in terms of performance and other utility
issues how it will benefit me?

Thanks in advance.

Amol

 

SEOMike

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 251 posted 7:36 pm on Mar 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

P4 compared to P4M is simply a case of the P4M having some additional power-saving features, as well as being tested and verified to run at lower voltages. Clock for clock, the P4 and P4M should be essentially identical (at least, assuming that the chipset, cache, FSB, etc. is clocked the same), but the P4M should be able to consume less power. So a regular P4 2.4 would run at 1.5V, I believe (actually, according to [support.intel.com...] it could be 1.50V or 1.525V, and the P4 2.4C might have other options), whereas the P4M would be a 1.30V part at the same speed (http://support.intel.com/support/processors/mobile/pentium4/sb/CS-007499.htm), and it would scale down the voltage level as the processor ran at lower speeds. Finally, if we toss the Pentium-M back into the story, it runs at 1.484V for the top speed of 1.6 and 1.7 GHz, and uses lower voltages as it scales down speed. For typical power dissipation, the desktop P4 2.4 is around 60W (66W for the 800FSB version), the 2.4 P4M is 30W, and the 1.6/1.7 P-M is 24.5W.

Note that the P4M is only available in 100 MHz (400FSB) bus speeds, whereas the desktop version is available in 100, 133, and 200 MHz speeds (2.4, 2.4B, and 2.4C, respectively). With its dependence on memory bandwidth, theP4 2.4C is a LOT faster than the original 2.4 and the 2.4 P4M, at least in most applications. When in a laptop, the use of slower hard drives, memory, graphics, power saving features, etc. all combine to make a 2.4 GHz P4/P4M laptop substantially slower than a 2.4 GHz desktop. Throw the P-M into the mix, and things change even more. The P4 is designed to benefit from high clock speeds, but high clock speeds mean high power requirements. The P-M is designed more like the Athlon chips: higher efficiency, lower clock speeds. In addition, it is designed to rapidly cycle power to areas of the CPU that are not needed. It does this for the cache as well. All told, the P-M is a really good mobile solution. (And it has pretty much succeeded in killing off the Transmeta CPUs when it comes to laptops.)

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Hardware and OS Related Technologies / Smartphone, Wireless, and Mobile Technologies
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved