Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a ttoal mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. amzanig hu!?
"in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are" -- awkward grammar, at best
Form a pseanorl ptieevsprce, I seem to hvae a tlanet both for unibcrmalsng tsehe jeblmud seecenqus, smoe of wchih may be ihseeblcoinpmnre to mnay, and for iiinenftdyg uionitnnntael senliplg errros in cnvatonneiol deumtcnos. Ltos of pctacire panyilg Sarbcble, aalpnptery. ;^)
that or they're going to have to be a major word geek. I breezed over that paragraph - great one, tedster. Reminds me a small piece by Twain, where he illustrates how language may evolve, starting with the letter "f" disappearing. Can't bloody find it though, or I'd quote some of it on here.
Some people use misspellings to make their webpages look "more human" - still, I'd rather spell it right than wrong...