| 5:04 pm on Aug 1, 2001 (gmt 0)|
What's keeping M$ from selling Linux? They could sell it just as well as RedHat.
| 6:35 pm on Aug 1, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Nothing, really. I would suspect that their mindset, though, would keep them from it. Why would they introduce an OS to compete with their primary mover. Also, I think they know the general Linux community would cast more then a little skepticism their way. The entire licensing structure of Linux flies in the face of how MS chooses to work.
Microsoft makes plenty of money on what Microsoft does best: pushing it's OS (and Server & Office software) into a fairly captive market. It's recent restructuring of its SQL Server license fee structure suggests it's not have as easy a time in that market, however.
It wouldn't suprise me if in the future, MS takes a serious stab at a Linux or similar OS. It's dabbled in the past. But I think it would take something amazing to shift in the current market before MS takes considering their own distro seriously. They could do it, but they don't need to.
| 6:50 pm on Aug 1, 2001 (gmt 0)|
it would take something amazing to shift in the current market
Like a really unfavorable court remedy the the whole DOJ suit...
Even then, I don't think Linux is really their style. If they did an MS-nix, it would probably end up defeating the purpose of the whole Linux/open source idea by somehow only being reliably compatible with MS apps... meaning they'd have to write a whole bunch of MS-nix apps to go with it.
Are there any OS companies that really produce and promote more than one "family" of OSes? Apple does Mac desktop and Server OSes, MS does Winders, RedHat does Linux, etc. Nobody really does more than one... tho' OSX is scooting closer to the *nix realm.
| 6:58 pm on Aug 1, 2001 (gmt 0)|
> Nobody really does more than one.
Just a guess here, but IBM, which does the whole AS/### series, and OS/2, is also looking into (or already does...'fraid I don't keep to up to date on IBM stuff....) a distro of Linux. I suspect, that if they want it to run on their hardware, and not be strictly Intel-based, that they will roll their own version. 'course the other rumor I heard from a co-worker (you can value that as you wanna. ;)) is that they are partnering with SuSE to create their version of Linux. But again, I'm not up to date on IBM info, just trying to come up with an example. :)
| 1:48 am on Aug 3, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Well, IBM has all but flushed OS/2. It is available only as a server for specific functions (like PC/390 host).
I think I heard the linux crowd trumpet that they're selling linux now.
McSoft wouldn't dare get into anything "infected" with GNU. If they wanted to get further into the UNIX market, they'd just beef up their stranglehold in SCO.
On a related note, McSoft will not do anything but Intel (er.. x86) these days, either. They've successfully flushed the projects associated with the other cpu arches and now will have nothing to do with them.
Ironically, that fits the SCO paradigm. :-)
| 1:58 am on Aug 3, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Simple....because they cannot claim it as their own. Look at how they are treating Java platforms these days. Anything they release, they want to say that it is MS and only MS.
Plus it would be a money drain for them at this moment to work so hard to have their products accomodate it. Dell, one of the best comp. manf., has just dropped RedHat from it's line of personal computers because they just were not making a profit out of it.
Now, when you are talking server software, MS won't touch it because they have their own stuff to pump out.
When Linux gets to a much higher level than it is at this time for personal computing, MS will probably play with it some. At least somehow better equip their Office Suite to run without problems.
IMHO, they will do their best to make sure Linux does not grow. Will they do it? Who knows :o
| 8:04 am on Aug 7, 2001 (gmt 0)|
IMHO, they will do their best to make sure Linux does not grow. Will they do it? Who knows…
I certainly don't, but I'm not so sure MS do either at this stage. I think if they did go ahead with their own distro, the push would sway towards MS*nix-specific software for a set period, before the Windoze architecture begins to have cross-(MS)OS compatibility. That (compatibility) would continue to develop until it reaches a point where the MS*nix platform can be scrapped because all the apps work in the latest release of Windoze anyway.
That might be one way that MS does away with *nix platforms, but I doubt it.