| 10:39 pm on May 16, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I tried searching their site (well, using alltheweb) and still couldn't find any solid info.
Perhaps you could take a closer look at a 'unique word list' of your competitor's site(s) and then match that witha 'unique word list' from your page(s) and then try spotting the language that you have which they lack?
That would take some time & analysis, but it would be a bit better than idle speculation about their filtering mechanisms, perhaps.
Though hopefully, another member has an idea for a method which will work & be quick.
| 3:19 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
you should compare your and your competitors meta-keywords
| 10:53 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Yep, only careful comparison will help. Do you have PFI pages? Those are good for testing.
It does not seem to be side wide, but on a per page basis.
| 11:16 pm on May 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I've done some careful comparisons between my "offending pages" and the competition's and indeed the only differences seem to be in the meta tags. I am using an SSI header on many pages of my site and it turned out that only these pages were affected. This however made it easier to isolate the "offending word." I will post an update as to how things turned out as soon as the changes are updated to the new index.
Thanks for the helpful responses everyone!
| 3:44 pm on Jun 28, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Well the problem persists. However, I am still waiting for something to happen. A lot of new pages which I've created are not yet included in the index so it appears as though ATW hasn't had an update.
Perhaps someone else knows whether ATW has performed an update of their index?
<updated>I actually just found some answers to my questions in the "ATW Updates" thread </updated>
| 11:59 am on Jul 18, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Maybe it would be worth asking ATW for clarification to why your site has been highlighted as offensive.
| 8:52 pm on Jul 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I had sticky mailed you a while back asking for your domain and I said I would look into it. Have not heard back from you. BTW, we just did an update this last week.
| 10:07 pm on Jul 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for checking up here Tim and for the heads up regarding the update.