engine
msg:224239 | 10:13 am on Oct 23, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I've noticed that too, it is pretty quick and is, currently, faster than Google. I'm seeing exactly the same traffic situation.
Googlebot was first to vist but ATW was first to show in the SERPS by a number of weeks.
I do submit sites to ATW and I let Googlebot find its own way.
|
Rumbas
msg:224240 | 10:29 am on Oct 23, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Good to hear Mayor that FAST actually is fast :) FAST would probably have found you through the links pointing to your site. Are those sites in the index already?
|
mayor
msg:224241 | 5:03 pm on Oct 23, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Rumbas, I didn't check but I guess they must be. I was just surprised because I got the links to make Google happy and Fast zipped right in while I'm still waiting for everyone else.
|
mayor
msg:224242 | 5:28 pm on Oct 23, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yes, Rumbas, I checked and found at least one site that links to my new site in the Fast index.
|
Rumbas
msg:224243 | 11:26 am on Oct 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Aha, that could be the reason then.
Anyway, good to see the fast spidering. I hope they will keep it up in the future, cuz we need that 'basket' to put our eggs in as well imo.
|
ikbenhet1
msg:224244 | 11:39 am on Oct 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
there fast in including new sites, but slower in description freshness title changes etc.
|
mat_bastian
msg:224245 | 8:49 am on Nov 1, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I submit, but I have to say that the spider comes quick and and it's hungry when it gets there. I have been getting in and ranking VERY well in ATW I can't get google to come no matter what most of the time, and when I did get it through on another site, it slapped me with a PR0 right off the bat. That's over two months ago and no lifting of it. I really wish Fast was more prominent in other engines.
|
|
