Rumbas
msg:220933 | 12:56 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
>FAST doesn't like a site Backus it depends on what you actually mean by "doesn't like". They will index files with a .php extension.
Look at this [alltheweb.com] search, SERP #100.
I would rewrite "?" in the example though. Not sure wether a .php has any effect on rankings.
Anyone?
|
heini
msg:220934 | 1:14 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
At a quick glance I found some good ranking pages with .php. Backus, do you have such pages that rank significantly better in Google than Fast?
|
backus
msg:220935 | 1:22 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
some cases, yes...why?
|
heini
msg:220936 | 1:57 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Just asking what your suspicion is based upon. I compared a few php files` ranking between Google and Fast, saw no evidence so far for .php pages systematically ranking worse in Fast.
|
backus
msg:220937 | 2:06 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
I think you mis-understand... If I have a site, which has an index.html page, and a site which is index.php, is there a possibility that the index.php site will not be accepted?
|
heini
msg:220938 | 2:43 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Backus, all I can say is: Fast indexes files with php extension. I canīt imagine it being a problem if the index page is a php file. To make sure you could try asking Fast. They are reported to be very responsive...
|
rpking
msg:220939 | 4:02 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
It would be very hypocritical to say the least... [alltheweb.com ]
|
heini
msg:220940 | 4:28 pm on Nov 9, 2001 (gmt 0) |
:)
Thanks, rpking - convincing example
|
|
