homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.204.231.253
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Site Graphics and Multimedia Design Forum

    
KPT Effects or Xenofex
opinions?
JamesR




msg:852099
 5:58 pm on Jan 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Debating between these two filters packages and their usefulness. Thoughts?

 

korkus2000




msg:852100
 6:22 pm on Jan 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Both are excellent packages. Do you have eye candy? The only problem with these filter packages are they are nice, but they both have some cheesy effects that are hard to incorporate into professional graphics. If I had to choose personally I like Xenofex better.

mat




msg:852101
 6:28 pm on Jan 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

Ditto the above, both have lots of 'wow' factor, but little use for everyday web stuff. Again, I'd come down on the side of Xenofex - the 'fluffy cloud' filter is useful for dull skies.

I use Blade Pro the most, for texturing, text effects and buttons.

Mat

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved