homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.111.87
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: not2easy

Site Graphics and Multimedia Design Forum

    
Image size of action photos
grnidone




msg:849289
 10:18 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

Of course everyone wants their images to be as small as possible to download quickly.

But when you have action shots, you need to make the image larger than you would a portrait shot.

If the image kept small, you can't see what is going on in the photo; too big you have download problems.

Do you guys have a good 'rule of thumb' regarding image size to use on action shots vs regular portrait type pictures?

-G

 

oilman




msg:849290
 10:30 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

for me it really depends on the audience. If it's something very specific and the audience is almost guaranteed to wanted the info on the page etc I can allow myself to relax a little and go with a bigger image. On the other side I'll often go with an interlaced image so that there is at least a blurry picture to start. I've found folks are more willing to wait and see how the pic turns out than they are to wait for a blank box to fill in.

rcjordan




msg:849291
 11:37 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

>rule of thumb

For jpg shots that have detail that's important to the topic, I like the largest dimension to be 320p. For "accent" and secondary shots, I'll drop the largest dimension to 220p. I've found this works out pretty well both for speed issues and layout.

We've discussed it before, but getting too small for the higher resolution screens is a concern, too. Like everything else, it's a balancing act.

mivox




msg:849292
 11:44 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

One idea: using a cropped thumbnail, linked to a full size "opens in new window" image.

Say you have a photo of the first three horses crossing the finish line in the big race, but to have a nice clear photo showing all three, the image would need ot be 500-600 pixels wide...

Crop the image down to a nice, tight shot of the #1 horse's head, which you can then optimize for quick viewing and high quality, linked to a new window showing the full shot for those who want to see it.

rcjordan




msg:849293
 11:51 pm on Jun 29, 2001 (gmt 0)

>the image would need ot be 500-600 pixels wide
>
And list all of those supersize shots, each with its own html page (with links to OTHER pages in the site, natch) in a directory that says "Download pictures, FREE for non-commercial use." You can't imagine the traffic I get from this trick.

Robert Charlton




msg:849294
 4:31 am on Jun 30, 2001 (gmt 0)

At the mention of "action" shots, some full screen sports jpegs from the NBC Olympics Site (built by Quokka Sports here in the SF Bay Area) came to mind. These were easily 800 by 600, and provided full screen backgrounds for the site... but the file size, it turns out, was very small... 10K. The trick was that they were monochrome... tinted sepia or whatever. The size on the webpage was enough to compensate for lack of full color.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved