homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: not2easy

Site Graphics and Multimedia Design Forum

"Secured" Graphics

 1:08 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

Has anyone tried to "secure" graphics so they either cannot be saved from a website or cannot be printed if they are downloaded? I have a client that wants to put thumbnails of classic car paintings on a website but prevent a visitor from d/l and printing them (he is selling the limited edition of them). Any ideas?



 1:15 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

I know that it can be done with Java........

Black Knight

 1:38 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

There's at least one commercially available (reasonably cheap) script to do this - basically the call for the image really goes to the script which then shows but protects the image. I don't know how that works about people saving the image from the cache though...


 1:49 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

there is a CSS trick which does a similar thing. Basically you can use an empty <span> tag
and set the image as its background. which prevents people from right clicking and 'saving as'

But I dont see how any 'image protection' can really be enforced as all the user has to is hit the print screen button


 2:03 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

Visibly watermarking an image with a logo will mean that the user can download it but it will be unusable. In any event a 72dpi jpeg is useless for print reproduction and can really only be re-used on the web. In practice most artists have no problem puting their work online for this reason. Plus if the image is re-used (with your name and url watermarked into it) it is just more free publicity for you.


 2:07 pm on May 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

For an example of visual watermarking go to [photodisc.com...]


 2:36 pm on May 25, 2001 (gmt 0)

A completely different approach would be:

Do not 'secure' the images as such, but make them unusable in other ways: a 320x200x256 color picture at 75dpi looks good on screen, but won't be of much use when printed. Plus, using eg. jpeg compression will make it small, and virtually uneditable.


 2:38 pm on May 25, 2001 (gmt 0)

sorry, just saw that the point was already made by typophile.

please disregard previous post

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved