homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.183.169
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: not2easy

Site Graphics and Multimedia Design Forum

    
Does anyone bother with slicing images any more?
Photoshop feature seems to be obsolete already
GuanoLad

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 2:57 am on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

I've never seen the need for slicing images, and now we're in the age of broadband, larger page weights are becoming much more acceptable.

Have you ever seen (or currently see) the need for slicing large images?

 

Maylin

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 3:17 am on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

Yeah, I do. Not everybody is on broadband. I'm not. It's not even available where I'm staying right now. (I move a lot so this isn't always the case). If I didn't do work on the internet, it would be unlikely that I would bother getting broadband over dialup after I move... it's just a more expensive bill to pay and there's other things I need the money for. I might be an exception these days, but I wouldn't assume that all potential visitors are on a high speed connection. If a site takes a long time to load, unless I already know this site has something I can't get from anywhere else, I hit stop and go to another site.

Slicing allows me to compress parts of the image differently, so I still get a high quality looking image that loads fast. I'm very friendly toward dialup users because I'm one of them. So if the person I'm doing the site for likes lots of graphics, I slice as a compromise.

A totally different reason: I have a tv show site that I'm slicing right now because there is a certain "preview" graphic that is supposed to change on a regular basis for new episodes. This is worked into the site interface, and i need control over that individual square.

[edited by: Maylin at 3:24 am (utc) on May 11, 2004]

jatar_k

WebmasterWorld Administrator jatar_k us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 3:22 am on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

I do with every image, slice em small, optimize them as much as I can to get the highest quality at the smallest size.

If my page weights are tiny, they will be that much faster for broadband and dialup users alike.

Also, no need for me to take up all that bandwidth with big images.

XtendScott

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 3:51 am on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

I slice em but don't(ok rarely) use the generated HTML code with spacers and 1px tall images to define table column width on the leading table rows.

benihana

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 8:02 am on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

yep i slice them all the time, but generally optimise and save one by one, and never use the generate html feature.

shahid

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 1:14 pm on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

You need to slice whenever you find the image size exceeding an optimum limit. Particularly in cases when a page layout is designed in photoshop.

pageoneresults

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 1:33 pm on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

I slice only when needed. Image size (bytes) is what I'm concerned about. Selective optimization is also a big plus. Many times parts of a sliced image can be in .gif instead of .jpg.

I also make sure that I do not end up with oddball slices. Never slice a client logo if you don't have to. Never slice through text unless you have to. I follow a very strict set of guidelines when slicing. I want to make sure that the slices by themselves are understandable and that I haven't left someone with half a graphic link or whatever it may be.

carolynf

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 1:54 pm on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

Using the generated code can actually result in sluggish transfers, because it creates an image tag for every little area on the screen.

highman

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 2:03 pm on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

>Selective optimization is also a big plus

Yes indeed! very handy feature in fireworks, leave the eye catching part of an image crisp, compress any areas no 'so important'

pageoneresults

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 2:07 pm on May 11, 2004 (gmt 0)

Because it creates an image tag for every little area on the screen.

Only if you are designing with tables. Since I utilize CSS and absolute positioning on main graphic navigational elements, I utilize the export as CSS function. I may end up with 4, 6 maybe 8 slices total. Here's a basic example...

External CSS File

div.top1{position:absolute;top:10px;left:10px;}
div.top2{position:absolute;top:20px;left:20px;}
div.top3{position:absolute;top:30px;left:30px;}
div.top4{position:absolute;top:40px;left:40px;}

HTML

<div class="top1">Slice 1</div>
<div class="top2">Slice 2</div>
<div class="top3">Slice 3</div>
<div class="top4">Slice 4</div>

pixelkat

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 1457 posted 6:41 am on May 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

lately, I've been using a lot of css to minimize the number of images I use. the rest I chop manually in pshop, as I have always done. and code manually as well. I don't trust any wysiwyg app generate code for me. too much garbage code.

kat

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Code, Content, and Presentation / Site Graphics and Multimedia Design
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved