homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.128.254
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Yahoo / Yahoo Search Engine and Directory
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Yahoo Search Engine and Directory Forum

This 103 message thread spans 4 pages: < < 103 ( 1 2 [3] 4 > >     
Yahoo is GONE!
All overture and google with no more yahoo.
Internet Marketing M

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 1:33 am on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

All overture and google with no more yahoo. I verified this from different machines, cleared cookies, everything at 9:32pm EST. Can anyone else verify this?

 

Tor

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 8:36 am on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

I`m not seing any difference from my part of the world...

chiyo

WebmasterWorld Senior Member chiyo us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 9:01 am on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

It seems the "changed default page" was only there for an hour so so, or maybe minutes. The only thing it suggests to me is that yahoo is trialing or experimenting with different options... but maybe more aggressively than usual.

..though that yahoo info page that now refers only to "third party PAID listings" may be a portent that Google is being replaced for web searches. by say a bigger overture prescence or inktomi or ls or any PAID listings provider. I wonder if Y! will allow more unpaid listings. At the moment yahoo directory is full of coporate and commercial results so that looking for information is frustrating. If Y! goes the way of almost all paid listings, how long will Y! users take to convert to Google proper, ATW, Teoma or wisenut? Will they notice the commercialization of the index? Or is Y! indeed forgetting about non-commercial search as a key component of their offering, taking money while it runs it down, and turns their attention to portalish type things?

Curioser and Curioser...

rmjvol

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 12:08 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Chiyo, I saw the new results about an hour after Internet Marketing M first posted and they were very stable for another hour for me. So about 2 hours total. Not seen them since then.

"These results show a combination of relevant web pages and web sites provided by our third-party search partners and the Yahoo! Directory."
makes me think they'll continue to have a third party spider involved. Not going to purchase/develop their own technology.

"Third-party search partners may provide listings for which the third party has received payment to review and/or include the site within its database."
You can read this 2 ways. Either they're planning to use somebody like Ink or Fast that has a PFI or maybe it's just an open ended statement ("may provide") that things may change in the future.

Having Google drive the results doesn't make sense for a company that's historically followed the money at the expense of quality results.

mediaman

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 12:47 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Y! does this when their servers go off line for maintenance.

Results then revert to Google.

I have seen this happen many times over the last year and a half so I wouldn't panic at all.

rmjvol

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 1:30 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

>Y! does this when their servers go off line for maintenance.

Does what? Changes their "What are the different sections of the search results page?" help text? And replaces Google's snippets with Y descriptions? And changes their "Summary ¶ Categories ¶ Web Sites ¶ Web Pages ¶ News" headings?

I think not.

Lingerboy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 1:40 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

I too saw this new format last night:
Search in: The Web ¦ Directory ¦ News

The Web section were the default results, and it was pure Google rank with Yahoo titles and descriptions for the sites also in the Yahoo Directory. The Directory was normal Yahoo results.

This is very strange. The effect on Yahoo's paid inclusion and sposorships will be very neggative. Why bother. Google get's you 90% of Yahoo with this new format.

Dumb move for Yahoo I think.

Maybe there is more to this. I was thinking that maybe they will supliment it with AV or INKs new trusted feed programs (CPC) removing the Google deep links when they can sub in an INK or AV listing.

Now that would be very smart. They would have the most complete listings, and they would be getting paid for some of the the SERPS.

needsomehelp

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 1:45 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

"When a web site listed in search results is also listed in the Yahoo! Directory, the search result listing will show the title and description provided by the Yahoo! Directory."

What is the value of your Yahoo! listing if your are removed from third parties index for some reason. I am sure we have all experienced that some time or another whether it was server problems, unethical practices or just plain old getting dropped for a month.

"In addition, you'll see a "More sites about" link at the bottom of the listing. Click on this link to browse a collection of similar sites in the Yahoo! Directory."

This really degrades the value of a Yahoo! listing. If this info from help page does indeed stick, why would any of us pay $299 + annual fee to be listed as third string, below sponsored and serps? Understood that keyword-keyword-keyword-keyword-.com domains flood directory but it seems foolish to eliminate revenue of over 650 new sites daily @ $299 = $194,350 daily and almost 80 million annual, with out including annual renewal fee.

Yahoo! needs to implement a new model without taking too much away from its roots, its directory.....

IMHO I feel this change will put Yahoo! on the way out, like Excite, AV ect. especially if they use Inktomi or FAST. I am involved in some of the more competetive industries online and have only seen FAST results as junk, loaded with SPAM, redirects and cloaking. I also see a strong dominance of UK websites, leaving US surfers little to choose from on first page of results. Surfers will sway to different engines. We have seen this downfall before.

seodaddy99

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 2:15 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Noticed 6 overture results in yahoo now, 3 at the top & 3 at the bottom. Did I miss the change from 5 ---> 6 a long time ago or is this new?

Hard to believe Yahoo will give up $ from directory submissions/renewals -

mat

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 2:22 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Up goes the plaintive cry (again) ... is anyone seeing this 'new' stuff at present? Mat

NoCarrier

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 2:27 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

"Up goes the plaintive cry (again) ... is anyone seeing this 'new' stuff at present? Mat"

No, still the old Yahoo!

Why!? What do you get right now?! Don't scare me..

mat

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 2:33 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

No, no, I just want to see this 'new' look/behaviour, that's all. This sort of stuff alway seems to go on in the middle of the night here. Mat

olias

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 2:36 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Yeah, annoying that it was the middle of the night uk time, but my server logs quite clearly show very nice traffic from Yahoo for 50 minutes. :)
I'm just hoping it switches back again sometime soon.

Learning Curve

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 3:38 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

I'm not sure Yahoo Express would wither if this change were to happen. Isn't the Google PR boost the first or second most important reason for being in the Yahoo directory? This change would increase Google traffic and so the value of the PR boost of a Yahoo directory listing.

Are some of you thinking that this change is a prelude to dropping Google?! I'm thinking that if Google were kicked out of Yahoo, there would be little incentive for Google to maintain the exceptional PR boost of a Yahoo directory listing. Without the PR boost, Yahoo Express would be hammered.

I don't know if Yahoo and Google like each other. But they don't need to. It's just a marriage of convenience and money.

Lingerboy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 3:39 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Maybe they are just testing the methodology using the Google data, only b/c they have a licence to use it. Maybe they will use completely different data when they launch this. Wishful thinking to be sure, but I just can't figure our why they would PAY Google when they have the leverage to GET PAID for their SERPS. They could easily assemble an array of PPC XML partners (AV and INK for example) who could share CPC revenue with them, while accomplishing the same goal of expanding their listings.

Why Yahoo!, why?

Lingerboy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 3:53 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Learning Curve, I see your point regarding the PR effect of a $299 Yahoo listing....but will the newbie see this....I doubt it. It's way to esoteric and indirect. How would the market that? "Pay us $299 so that we include you in our directory....which is pretty well hidden....BUT...there is a chance that it will effect your PageRank (link to long and obscure explaination of what this means)....and on and on".....It will not work. The masses will not be able to absorb the concept.

nowhere

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 4:04 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

This thread is about as clear as mud

Iím glad Iím not alone. I donít know whether I should be happy or sad. If both directory and Google listings were on the first page, wouldnít this benefit everyone?

nowhere

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 4:09 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

"Third-party search partners may provide listings for which the third party has received payment to review and/or include the site within its database."

Or they're just generically talking about Overture.

jaytierney

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 4:13 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

--

Learning Curve

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 4:26 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Lingerboy, you may be right and I may be biased because the change as described would benefit me.

But, I think those changes would get a lot more people to use Yahoo search and improve the "stickiness" of Yahoo's site overall.

Right now, the Google and Yahoo directory options provide the best search results, in my opinion. So why not concentrate on what's working for searchers? The current default page, however, is (for the keyword phrases I follow) a complete hodgepodge of sites.

Anyway, that's what I'm thinking this morning.

Lingerboy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 5:09 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

>I think those changes would get a lot more people to use Yahoo search and improve the "stickiness" of Yahoo's site overall.

I agree....but that is more of the "if we build it, they will come" reasoning that went out with dotcom IPOs. They need to monotize their search in a direct way. Having the best search is useless if you are just replicating what Google already has.

I think most webmaster will look at this and say "I'm not paying Yahoo $299 when I can get into Google for nothing, and Yahoo isn't even going to show my listing in their main results" If they want to spend money for position, they will see the Overture listings as a more direct method. Yahoo is shooting Express submit and their sposored listings in the head if they stick with the Google SERPS.

This benefits Overure more than anyone.

Philosopher

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 5:30 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

The more I look at this the more I think that the prediction by Grumpus in an earlier thread [webmasterworld.com] that the Yahoo directory would soon be phased out was correct. If they were to phase out the directory, this would be the first logical step...downgrading the importance of actual directory listings.

While Yahoo has currently reverted back to it's normal listings, the help page cited earlier in this thread is still live and plainly states


Web Page Matches
These results show a combination of relevant web pages and web sites provided by our third-party search partners and the Yahoo! Directory. This is the default style in which results appear.

So they start the process by first switching to this new format for their SERPs. They do two things to try and control the initial shock and backlash.

1) Claim that the new format contains a mixture of both directory and non-directory results. Remember the recent switch to using the Yahoo title and description for Yahoogle results? Poof..instant directory and search results "integration"

I can hear them already "No, we haven't gotten rid of the directory...we've simply integrated the web page and web sites results".

2) Continue to provide a link to the web sites section for those that only want directory results.

After a few months, once the public has accepted the new change, they continue to downgrade the importance of the directory until, eventually, it's gone.

Learning Curve

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 5:32 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

I think most webmaster will look at this and say "I'm not paying Yahoo $299 when I can get into Google for nothing...

Lingerboy: True, but some other webmasters will think, "I'll pay Yahoo $299 and maybe my PR will go up one point and that would be a great bargain."

I don't know how it would shake out, overall.

Lingerboy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 5:39 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Philosopher, you may be right on the money. If I were a Yahoo editor, I'd be working on my resume today.

Learningcurve, I agree that some of the more astute SEOs/webmasters, like yourselfs, will make the connection b/t a Yahoo listing and PR, but the masses, where the money is, will not get it. Yahoo is going to see their revenue errode in this area if they swap in Google for the SERPs.

Robino

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 6:35 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

They better lower the price to $2.99. Yahoo! in my opinion is scamming people left and right. Increased monthly billing for "Sponsor Listings" just so people can see [Sponsor]and have your site at the top in the DIRECTORY (which nobody uses). Pop-ups on Yahoo! are the worst they've ever been! Couple all of these things with bad "web sites" results and you have $299 for a link and its corresponding PR value!
Pooh on them!

Quinn

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 6:53 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Not to split hairs here but many seem to be taking the word default as if it means something other than "failure to find another solution" or something like that. The default setting has been a combination of relevant web pages (google) and web sites (google and Yahoo) provided by thier third-party search partners and the Yahoo directory (if the site is listed in the Yahoo directory, and appears under web pages, then why can't Yahoo say that it's coming from their directory?). It's been like this for some time. If it isn't immediately in the directory, it defaults to google. Some of google's results contain sites that are in the directory. So what?

Does anybody have a screenshot of the help page before the Yahoo results briefly changed?

<edit -clarification>

[edited by: Quinn at 7:07 pm (utc) on Oct. 9, 2002]

Napoleon



 
Msg#: 957 posted 6:59 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Nahh... I can't see it. Look at the numbers of additions for the last week:

∑ Tuesday Oct. 8 - 1032
∑ Monday Oct. 7 - 726
∑ Sunday Oct. 6 - 30
∑ Saturday Oct. 5 - 27
∑ Friday Oct. 4 - 736
∑ Thursday Oct. 3 - 671
∑ Wednesday Oct. 2 - 893

That's 4115.

I reckon almost all of these were paid for... yes... that's well over $1M per week.

Are they going to risk a big chunk of that? Well they might if the returns are good on where they are going to, but are they going to be in excess of $50M pa? I doubt it.

Even if they were, the smart move would be to try and get the best of both worlds. Keep the Directory high profile AND bring in new money through other routes.

I just can't see them dropping or significantly de-valuing the Directory. Then again... I am assuming a degree of intelligence in there.

nipear

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 7:13 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Are they going to risk a big chunk of that? Well they might if the returns are good on where they are going to, but are they going to be in excess of $50M

But remember this is a recurring fee. That means $100M next year and $150M the year after. etc... I also assume this is a very profitable division of the company. I don't see them going with straight google serps....

mayor

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 8:13 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

One of my log analysis reports shows search.yahoo and srd.yahoo have been making limited referrals. This thread has been about search.yahoo as far as I can tell. Does anyone else see srd.yahoo and if so, what might it be?

netcommr

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 8:47 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

mayor, srd.yahoo is the click tracking/redirect domain... been around for a while.

nowhere

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 9:07 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Not to split hairs here but many seem to be taking the word default as if it means something other than "failure to find another solution" or something like that.

I think you hit the head on the nail; or something like that. :)

The Google press release of 2000 reads:

Yahoo! Selects Google as its Default Search Engine Provider

Quinn

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 957 posted 9:15 pm on Oct 9, 2002 (gmt 0)

Its at it again. With a little red arrow by the google results which are in the Y directory.

This 103 message thread spans 4 pages: < < 103 ( 1 2 [3] 4 > >
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Yahoo / Yahoo Search Engine and Directory
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved