shabir

msg:841040 | 8:11 pm on Oct 21, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Cool..Google is still searching at 0.88 billion! Congrats Yahoo!
|
hdpt00

msg:841041 | 8:13 pm on Oct 21, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Anyone want a gentlemen's bet that Google updates their count within one (1) week from this post. Anyone?
|
Chndru

msg:841042 | 1:33 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Where is the one billion there?
|
Teknorat

msg:841043 | 7:07 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Says it on the front page. Yahoo! Image Search No other search engine gives you a more complete picture.- Now over 1 billion images
- Yada yada
- Yada yada
|
| Yahoo image search often finds that obscure image I'm searching for when Google doesn't. Well done Yahoo.
|
Brett_Tabke

msg:841044 | 9:27 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0) |
So this is a roll in/out of the old AllTheWeb multimedia and gfx object engine?
|
Chndru

msg:841045 | 4:58 pm on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0) |
>>Says it on the front page. Thanks. :) It just shows how much i hate their front page. I rarely go there, if i have to.
|
Teknorat

msg:841046 | 12:07 am on Oct 25, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Heh- it is an ugly old beast to be sure.
|
DigiSEO

msg:841047 | 9:49 pm on Oct 25, 2004 (gmt 0) |
600,000 of which are porn. Use Google if you want to get descent images.
|
fedtmule

msg:841048 | 7:26 am on Oct 26, 2004 (gmt 0) |
does that mean google doesn't have any porn?
|
DigiSEO

msg:841049 | 6:40 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0) |
No, Google has plenty. Yahoo! just has a whole lot more! :-)
|
RobBroekhuis

msg:841050 | 6:55 pm on Nov 2, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Does anybody know how to identify referrals that come through via Yahoo image search? I've tried a few times, and my logs show no referrer string. Rob
|
Spica

msg:841051 | 8:08 pm on Nov 4, 2004 (gmt 0) |
RobBroekhuis: On my logs, these show up with a referrer string starting with: "http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages
|
angiolo

msg:841052 | 11:34 am on Nov 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I wish I had the same rankings in the normal search; there is not a duplicate URL filter...
|
RobBroekhuis

msg:841053 | 1:09 pm on Nov 5, 2004 (gmt 0) |
d'oh! Never noticed until just now that my browser from work NEVER returns a referrer string, no matter where I come from (I don't usually get to my site via other sites, so I never noticed before). Is that a user browser setting, or more likely to be determined by a corporate tinkering/firewall? Rob
|
|