| 8:11 pm on Oct 21, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Cool..Google is still searching at 0.88 billion!
| 8:13 pm on Oct 21, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Anyone want a gentlemen's bet that Google updates their count within one (1) week from this post. Anyone?
| 1:33 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Where is the one billion there?
| 7:07 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Says it on the front page.
|Yahoo! Image Search |
No other search engine gives
you a more complete picture.
- Now over 1 billion images
- Yada yada
- Yada yada
Yahoo image search often finds that obscure image I'm searching for when Google doesn't. Well done Yahoo.
| 9:27 am on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0)|
So this is a roll in/out of the old AllTheWeb multimedia and gfx object engine?
| 4:58 pm on Oct 22, 2004 (gmt 0)|
>>Says it on the front page.
Thanks. :) It just shows how much i hate their front page. I rarely go there, if i have to.
| 12:07 am on Oct 25, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Heh- it is an ugly old beast to be sure.
| 9:49 pm on Oct 25, 2004 (gmt 0)|
600,000 of which are porn. Use Google if you want to get descent images.
| 7:26 am on Oct 26, 2004 (gmt 0)|
does that mean google doesn't have any porn?
| 6:40 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
No, Google has plenty. Yahoo! just has a whole lot more! :-)
| 6:55 pm on Nov 2, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Does anybody know how to identify referrals that come through via Yahoo image search? I've tried a few times, and my logs show no referrer string.
| 8:08 pm on Nov 4, 2004 (gmt 0)|
On my logs, these show up with a referrer string starting with:
| 11:34 am on Nov 5, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I wish I had the same rankings in the normal search; there is not a duplicate URL filter...
| 1:09 pm on Nov 5, 2004 (gmt 0)|
d'oh! Never noticed until just now that my browser from work NEVER returns a referrer string, no matter where I come from (I don't usually get to my site via other sites, so I never noticed before). Is that a user browser setting, or more likely to be determined by a corporate tinkering/firewall?