| 9:04 pm on Apr 18, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Would that not just be Overture/espotting?
| 9:06 pm on Apr 18, 2003 (gmt 0)|
This is the description of the web search results and NOT the sponsored listings on the top.
The link above has a section for the:
1) Inside Yahoo!
2) Directory Results
3) Sponsored listings
4) Web search results
They are all different, as we know, but this is the first time I'd read that.
| 2:34 pm on Apr 19, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Could THIS be the result?
| 1:36 am on Apr 24, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Ink Trusted Feed referrals are tracked by ultimate search syndication partner here. We've tracked no referrals from the setup associated with Ink but that's not to say it isn't happening.
| 7:45 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)|
If they were doing that, why wouldn't they announce it? They'd want people to pay, wouldn't they?
| 8:30 pm on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0)|
|Have I missed this...? I didn't realize they had such clear language on their site already about it. |
That language was posted in October, when they reupped with Google. They were clearly setting the stage to bring in PFI in addition to or as a replacement to Google, down the road. Without a doubt, you'll see Inktomi PFI listings at the very least in Yahoo web search results, in the near future.
| 4:13 pm on May 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
But I thought Inktomi just reupped with Looksmart to continue providing paid inclusion. LOOK described it as a multiyear deal. Does that mean Inktomi will be using LOOK and Yahoo will be using Inktomi for PFI?
| 9:05 pm on May 16, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Hi roflewinker, you might read up on LookSmart a bit - they don't offer paid for inclusion services.
They offer PPC - big difference. Huge, in fact. :)