| Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 220.127.116.11 |
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
|Pubcon Platinum Sponsor|
|Link Popularity & Popularity of Links (Page Rank) Website Ranking|
Link Popularity & Popularity of Links (Page Rank) Website Ranking
| 8:26 pm on Jul 27, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Google link analysis (link to) is incomplete and sometimes erroneous.
Their "contain the term" feature usually has most of the spidered and cached websites that actually link to a given site.
Since Link Analysis is a priority with Google, this ranking algorithm is important
| 1:01 am on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)|
good insight. I have on many occasions seen "0 sites linking" using the Toolbar for sites, and using contain the term, found hundreds.
| 2:45 am on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Can one of you explain that?
| 5:07 am on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)|
What is the search syntax for the contain the term feature? I like examples :0
| 12:35 am on Jul 29, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Do a search for [whateverdomain.com...]
Google will return a page that has a listing <or not> and says...
Find web pages that are similar to www.whateverdomain.com
Find web pages that link to www.whateverdomain.com
Find web pages that contain the term "www.whateverdomain.com"
Click on the link under "contain the term" and you will get a count, and SERP.
I find that occasionally the Backwards links in the toolbar sometimes returns a zero, yet this method shows hundreds.
The link to "contains the term" also give a much higher count than the "pages that link to" option.
Some of course,could be pages containing the URL, but not a live link.
| 2:39 am on Jul 29, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I did find it, and it turned out to be the same as typing in +www.yoursite.+com, so I started a thread to list all of the ways to get backward links: [webmasterworld.com...]
All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
© Webmaster World 1996-2013 all rights reserved