| 10:38 am on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
This sounds a LOT like a scheme I came up with early last year. Yeah, it worked, sort of, but the maintenance drove me insane!
I finally went to frameless pages, mostly out of mental health concerns I think, and found that already decent rankings improved even more, and site stickiness doubled.
If you insist on following this foolhardy venture, let me know when visiting hours are at the home, OK? ;)
| 4:25 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
I can understand what you mean there tedster, but the frames actually are part of a presentation and the underlying seo is secondary. I just thought since I had 400+ pages in that presentation "module" that I could put it to good use. The main seo is still at root and branches down into this area as well as others.
Should I keep spidey off the frameset?
| 5:27 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
BTW hours are from 6-8 M-W-F...no shiny objects, no sudden movements and bring me a Snickers bar.
| 5:29 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
>each "child" having links back to root
If you are going to do it spread the links about a bit more and not link them all back to the root.
| 5:32 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Why NFFC? Curious
| 5:57 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
I think there is only so much benefit that can be leveraged out of linking back to the root. Flag some of the other pages as being of importance, same goes for external link pop.
| 6:01 pm on Jan 17, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Gotcha...not so much template-y-ishness