| Supplementals ranking ABOVE me
... what does that mean? |
internetheaven
msg:774829 | 8:10 am on Jun 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Okay, so, if Google can't find enough "good" results from its regular database it uses the supplemental database. Yes? Well, out of the top ten supplemental results I was No.5 - but I wasn't listed as supplemental. How can pages that don't exist rank above me? If I was under some penalty then surely I would be supplementaled too? Or is it that the non-existent pages of a more authorative sites such as BBC are better for Google users than my page?
|
arran
msg:774830 | 6:48 pm on Jun 5, 2006 (gmt 0) |
I suspect age of domain and/or quality/quantity of inbounds is to blame. arran.
|
quixote
msg:774831 | 6:50 pm on Jun 5, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Supplemental pages might actually exist, as in the case of my site's recently troubled pages. Deciphering the logic of Google's index (supp and non-supp) right now is like trying to make a sandcastle in a tsunami.
|
|
|
